>From what I have researched, pCell technology is based on >Distributed-Input-Distributed-Output (DIDO) software defined radios.... >Number crunching in DIDO Data Center then send data to DIDO APs.. The quality >of performance for multiple clients while operating in same space is quite >impressive.
WIFI is still on the move. Jump onboard enjoy the ride. Kind regards, Adrian > On 23/02/2014, at 4:04 am, [email protected] wrote: > > Send CCIE_Wireless mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://onlinestudylist.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ccie_wireless > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Wireless digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: User and Guest policy configuration in WLC 5508 (cisco 2006) > 2. Future of Wireless - Wifi vs LTE (Andre Aubet) > 3. Re: Future of Wireless - Wifi vs LTE (George Stefanick) > 4. Re: Future of Wireless - Wifi vs LTE (Andre Aubet) > 5. Joining ACS to AD (Jay Killion (jakillio)) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 17:16:49 +0000 (GMT) > From: cisco 2006 <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Wireless] User and Guest policy configuration > in WLC 5508 > Message-ID: > <1393003009.46692.bpmail_high_noncarr...@web173204.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > > > OK , thank you so much for your time and your information. > > Best Regards, > Cisco2006 > > > ------------------------------ >> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 7:57 PM AST (Arabian) Jeff Rensink wrote: >> >> There really isn't a document that covers all of this. Basically we have >> our 3 methods of assigning an ACL to a client session. So how many >> different ways can we use AAA override, use different WLANs, or place >> clients on different interfaces? Many of these methods rely on completely >> different features, so they are in different documents. >> >> Regards, >> >> >> >> Jeff Rensink : Sr Instructor : iPexpert <http://www.ipexpert.com/> >> >> CCIE # 24834 :: Wireless / R&S >> >> :: World-Class Cisco Certification Training >> >> Direct: +1.810.326.1444 >> >> :: Free Videos <http://www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc> >> >> :: Free Training / Product Offerings <http://www.facebook.com/ipexpert> >> >> :: CCIE Blog <http://blog.ipexpert.com/> >> :: Twitter <http://www.twitter.com/ipexpert> >> >> >>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:50 AM, cisco 2006 <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Many Thanks for this illustration .Also I will ask you for a fover , if >>> can send me a document about this . >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> Cisco2006 >>> ------------------------------ >>>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 7:19 PM AST (Arabian) Jeff Rensink wrote: >>>> >>>> We only have 3 ways of assigning ACLs to client sessions. By the >>> interface >>>> that a client is assigned to, by the WLAN that a client associates to, and >>>> by using AAA override. >>>> >>>> If you do authentication locally on the WLC, the only AAA override option >>>> you have is by MAC address. So if you had 2 separate clients, you could >>>> use MAC filtering + AAA override and use a MAC filter entry to assign the >>>> clients to specific interfaces. You then have a different ACL per >>>> interface. This requires you to pre-populate MAC filtering entries, which >>>> would be fairly insane to do on a guest network. >>>> >>>> Another option would be separate WLANs. There they could use the same >>>> interface, but each WLAN has a different ACL. >>>> >>>> You could also use a combination of interface groups and static IP >>>> addressing on the clients. That would deterministically place clients >>> onto >>>> specific interfaces, which can have their own ACLs. >>>> >>>> But if you want a single classic guest WLAN setup, external authentication >>>> is your only reasonable option that I can think of. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jeff Rensink : Sr Instructor : iPexpert <http://www.ipexpert.com/> >>>> >>>> CCIE # 24834 :: Wireless / R&S >>>> >>>> :: World-Class Cisco Certification Training >>>> >>>> Direct: +1.810.326.1444 >>>> >>>> :: Free Videos <http://www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc> >>>> >>>> :: Free Training / Product Offerings <http://www.facebook.com/ipexpert> >>>> >>>> :: CCIE Blog <http://blog.ipexpert.com/> >>>> :: Twitter <http://www.twitter.com/ipexpert> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:14 AM, cisco 2006 <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Dear All, >>>> >>>> I need to configure the policy that allow some users access the Internet >>>> and the others just get the access to the Internal Network ( inside >>>> network ) in WLC 5508. How can I do this without using external server >>> for >>>> authentication and authorization ? >>>> >>>> Best Regards, >>>> Cisco2006 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos :: >>>> >>>> iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 14:57:38 +0100 > From: Andre Aubet <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" > <[email protected]> > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Wireless] Future of Wireless - Wifi vs LTE > Message-ID: > <CA+eR=u9n7tz+myioq0r6jhb-8c_jbitsqpkvnvosofgf5+w...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hi guys, > > As I study deeper in the 802.11 standards with the CCIE Wireless training, > I realize how smart and how magical the wireless communications can be. > I really love RF technologies!!! > > I recently saw this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4eMBBVG-MNY > > What is performed in this demonstration is simply amazing. Even with the > recent 802.11 standards, you can't dream to achieve such a performance. > They are able to concurrently run 4x Full-HD + 2x 4k streams!!! I'm really > fascinated by this new technology :) > > But then I wonder, what will be the future made of? Do you believe this new > pCell technology can be seen as the future by ISPs? And how the Wifi vs LTE > or 5G will evolve? > > I'm interested to hear your thoughts about this topic. > > Andre. > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > </archives/ccie_wireless/attachments/20140222/2fa6278c/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 08:09:18 -0600 > From: George Stefanick <[email protected]> > To: Andre Aubet <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Wireless] Future of Wireless - Wifi vs LTE > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > I visited Rice University two weeks ago. They have developed a working model > of a MU-mimo with 96 antennas. > > http://m.technologyreview.com/news/523686/a-96-antenna-system-tests-the-next-generation-of-wireless/ > > Whatever the future holds it's going to be interesting .. > > > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Feb 22, 2014, at 7:57 AM, Andre Aubet <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi guys, >> >> As I study deeper in the 802.11 standards with the CCIE Wireless training, I >> realize how smart and how magical the wireless communications can be. >> I really love RF technologies!!! >> >> I recently saw this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4eMBBVG-MNY >> >> What is performed in this demonstration is simply amazing. Even with the >> recent 802.11 standards, you can't dream to achieve such a performance. They >> are able to concurrently run 4x Full-HD + 2x 4k streams!!! I'm really >> fascinated by this new technology :) >> >> But then I wonder, what will be the future made of? Do you believe this new >> pCell technology can be seen as the future by ISPs? And how the Wifi vs LTE >> or 5G will evolve? >> >> I'm interested to hear your thoughts about this topic. >> >> Andre. >> _______________________________________________ >> Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos :: >> >> iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > </archives/ccie_wireless/attachments/20140222/7749321a/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 15:18:02 +0100 > From: Andre Aubet <[email protected]> > To: George Stefanick <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Wireless] Future of Wireless - Wifi vs LTE > Message-ID: > <CA+eR=u-tt3+v+rfz540u549t94ug1zgrqxmkh3hbsq_o+7d...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Fascinating, I totally share you enthusiasm George! > > > 2014-02-22 15:09 GMT+01:00 George Stefanick <[email protected]>: > >> I visited Rice University two weeks ago. They have developed a working >> model of a MU-mimo with 96 antennas. >> >> >> http://m.technologyreview.com/news/523686/a-96-antenna-system-tests-the-next-generation-of-wireless/ >> >> Whatever the future holds it's going to be interesting .. >> >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Feb 22, 2014, at 7:57 AM, Andre Aubet <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi guys, >> >> As I study deeper in the 802.11 standards with the CCIE Wireless training, >> I realize how smart and how magical the wireless communications can be. >> I really love RF technologies!!! >> >> I recently saw this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4eMBBVG-MNY >> >> What is performed in this demonstration is simply amazing. Even with the >> recent 802.11 standards, you can't dream to achieve such a performance. >> They are able to concurrently run 4x Full-HD + 2x 4k streams!!! I'm really >> fascinated by this new technology :) >> >> But then I wonder, what will be the future made of? Do you believe this >> new pCell technology can be seen as the future by ISPs? And how the Wifi vs >> LTE or 5G will evolve? >> >> I'm interested to hear your thoughts about this topic. >> >> Andre. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos :: >> >> iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > </archives/ccie_wireless/attachments/20140222/045ec22d/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 15:04:11 +0000 > From: "Jay Killion (jakillio)" <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" > <[email protected]> > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Wireless] Joining ACS to AD > Message-ID: <cf2e1888.15349%[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Hi all - > > I'm having trouble adding ACS to AD, any tips would be appreciated. When I > go to 'External Identity Stores / Active Directory' in ACS, I enter the AD > name and credentials then 'test'. It always comes back with "can not resolve > network address". > > However, from ACS command line I can ping the domain name and it both > resolves and pings without issue. What should I check next? I don't > understand why I am able to resolve the name fine from CLI but the GUI won't. > > Thanks - > > Jay Killion, CCIE #17873 R/S > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: </archives/ccie_wireless/attachments/20140222/2bb81de2/attachment.html> > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos :: > > iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc > > End of CCIE_Wireless Digest, Vol 58, Issue 81 > ********************************************* _______________________________________________ Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos :: iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
