Hi Guys, How will you determine the number of pcells to be in an area? As in, how will they assess or find out how many people are going to be at a specific point at a given time?
Regards, Bala. On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 5:52 AM, Adrian Soh <[email protected]> wrote: > From what I have researched, pCell technology is based on > Distributed-Input-Distributed-Output (DIDO) software defined radios.... > Number crunching in DIDO Data Center then send data to DIDO APs.. The > quality of performance for multiple clients while operating in same space > is quite impressive. > > WIFI is still on the move. Jump onboard enjoy the ride. > > Kind regards, > Adrian > > > On 23/02/2014, at 4:04 am, [email protected]: > > > > Send CCIE_Wireless mailing list submissions to > > [email protected] > > > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > > http://onlinestudylist.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ccie_wireless > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > > [email protected] > > > > You can reach the person managing the list at > > [email protected] > > > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > > than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Wireless digest..." > > > > > > Today's Topics: > > > > 1. Re: User and Guest policy configuration in WLC 5508 (cisco 2006) > > 2. Future of Wireless - Wifi vs LTE (Andre Aubet) > > 3. Re: Future of Wireless - Wifi vs LTE (George Stefanick) > > 4. Re: Future of Wireless - Wifi vs LTE (Andre Aubet) > > 5. Joining ACS to AD (Jay Killion (jakillio)) > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Message: 1 > > Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 17:16:49 +0000 (GMT) > > From: cisco 2006 <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Wireless] User and Guest policy configuration > > in WLC 5508 > > Message-ID: > > <1393003009.46692.bpmail_high_noncarr...@web173204.mail.ir2.yahoo.com > > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > > > > > > > OK , thank you so much for your time and your information. > > > > Best Regards, > > Cisco2006 > > > > > > ------------------------------ > >> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 7:57 PM AST (Arabian) Jeff Rensink wrote: > >> > >> There really isn't a document that covers all of this. Basically we > have > >> our 3 methods of assigning an ACL to a client session. So how many > >> different ways can we use AAA override, use different WLANs, or place > >> clients on different interfaces? Many of these methods rely on > completely > >> different features, so they are in different documents. > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> > >> > >> Jeff Rensink : Sr Instructor : iPexpert <http://www.ipexpert.com/> > >> > >> CCIE # 24834 :: Wireless / R&S > >> > >> :: World-Class Cisco Certification Training > >> > >> Direct: +1.810.326.1444 > >> > >> :: Free Videos <http://www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc> > >> > >> :: Free Training / Product Offerings <http://www.facebook.com/ipexpert> > >> > >> :: CCIE Blog <http://blog.ipexpert.com/> > >> :: Twitter <http://www.twitter.com/ipexpert> > >> > >> > >>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:50 AM, cisco 2006 <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Many Thanks for this illustration .Also I will ask you for a fover , if > >>> can send me a document about this . > >>> > >>> Best Regards, > >>> Cisco2006 > >>> ------------------------------ > >>>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 7:19 PM AST (Arabian) Jeff Rensink wrote: > >>>> > >>>> We only have 3 ways of assigning ACLs to client sessions. By the > >>> interface > >>>> that a client is assigned to, by the WLAN that a client associates > to, and > >>>> by using AAA override. > >>>> > >>>> If you do authentication locally on the WLC, the only AAA override > option > >>>> you have is by MAC address. So if you had 2 separate clients, you > could > >>>> use MAC filtering + AAA override and use a MAC filter entry to assign > the > >>>> clients to specific interfaces. You then have a different ACL per > >>>> interface. This requires you to pre-populate MAC filtering entries, > which > >>>> would be fairly insane to do on a guest network. > >>>> > >>>> Another option would be separate WLANs. There they could use the same > >>>> interface, but each WLAN has a different ACL. > >>>> > >>>> You could also use a combination of interface groups and static IP > >>>> addressing on the clients. That would deterministically place clients > >>> onto > >>>> specific interfaces, which can have their own ACLs. > >>>> > >>>> But if you want a single classic guest WLAN setup, external > authentication > >>>> is your only reasonable option that I can think of. > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Jeff Rensink : Sr Instructor : iPexpert <http://www.ipexpert.com/> > >>>> > >>>> CCIE # 24834 :: Wireless / R&S > >>>> > >>>> :: World-Class Cisco Certification Training > >>>> > >>>> Direct: +1.810.326.1444 > >>>> > >>>> :: Free Videos <http://www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc> > >>>> > >>>> :: Free Training / Product Offerings < > http://www.facebook.com/ipexpert> > >>>> > >>>> :: CCIE Blog <http://blog.ipexpert.com/> > >>>> :: Twitter <http://www.twitter.com/ipexpert> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:14 AM, cisco 2006 <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Dear All, > >>>> > >>>> I need to configure the policy that allow some users access the > Internet > >>>> and the others just get the access to the Internal Network ( inside > >>>> network ) in WLC 5508. How can I do this without using external server > >>> for > >>>> authentication and authorization ? > >>>> > >>>> Best Regards, > >>>> Cisco2006 > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos > :: > >>>> > >>>> iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 2 > > Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 14:57:38 +0100 > > From: Andre Aubet <[email protected]> > > To: "[email protected]" > > <[email protected]> > > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Wireless] Future of Wireless - Wifi vs LTE > > Message-ID: > > <CA+eR=u9n7tz+myioq0r6jhb-8c_jbitsqpkvnvosofgf5+w...@mail.gmail.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > > > Hi guys, > > > > As I study deeper in the 802.11 standards with the CCIE Wireless > training, > > I realize how smart and how magical the wireless communications can be. > > I really love RF technologies!!! > > > > I recently saw this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4eMBBVG-MNY > > > > What is performed in this demonstration is simply amazing. Even with the > > recent 802.11 standards, you can't dream to achieve such a performance. > > They are able to concurrently run 4x Full-HD + 2x 4k streams!!! I'm > really > > fascinated by this new technology :) > > > > But then I wonder, what will be the future made of? Do you believe this > new > > pCell technology can be seen as the future by ISPs? And how the Wifi vs > LTE > > or 5G will evolve? > > > > I'm interested to hear your thoughts about this topic. > > > > Andre. > > -------------- next part -------------- > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > > URL: > </archives/ccie_wireless/attachments/20140222/2fa6278c/attachment-0001.html> > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 3 > > Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 08:09:18 -0600 > > From: George Stefanick <[email protected]> > > To: Andre Aubet <[email protected]> > > Cc: "[email protected]" > > <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Wireless] Future of Wireless - Wifi vs LTE > > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > > > I visited Rice University two weeks ago. They have developed a working > model of a MU-mimo with 96 antennas. > > > > > http://m.technologyreview.com/news/523686/a-96-antenna-system-tests-the-next-generation-of-wireless/ > > > > Whatever the future holds it's going to be interesting .. > > > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > >> On Feb 22, 2014, at 7:57 AM, Andre Aubet <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Hi guys, > >> > >> As I study deeper in the 802.11 standards with the CCIE Wireless > training, I realize how smart and how magical the wireless communications > can be. > >> I really love RF technologies!!! > >> > >> I recently saw this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4eMBBVG-MNY > >> > >> What is performed in this demonstration is simply amazing. Even with > the recent 802.11 standards, you can't dream to achieve such a performance. > They are able to concurrently run 4x Full-HD + 2x 4k streams!!! I'm really > fascinated by this new technology :) > >> > >> But then I wonder, what will be the future made of? Do you believe this > new pCell technology can be seen as the future by ISPs? And how the Wifi vs > LTE or 5G will evolve? > >> > >> I'm interested to hear your thoughts about this topic. > >> > >> Andre. > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos :: > >> > >> iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc > > -------------- next part -------------- > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > > URL: > </archives/ccie_wireless/attachments/20140222/7749321a/attachment-0001.html> > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 4 > > Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 15:18:02 +0100 > > From: Andre Aubet <[email protected]> > > To: George Stefanick <[email protected]> > > Cc: "[email protected]" > > <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Wireless] Future of Wireless - Wifi vs LTE > > Message-ID: > > <CA+eR=u-tt3+v+rfz540u549t94ug1zgrqxmkh3hbsq_o+7d...@mail.gmail.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > > > Fascinating, I totally share you enthusiasm George! > > > > > > 2014-02-22 15:09 GMT+01:00 George Stefanick < > [email protected]>: > > > >> I visited Rice University two weeks ago. They have developed a working > >> model of a MU-mimo with 96 antennas. > >> > >> > >> > http://m.technologyreview.com/news/523686/a-96-antenna-system-tests-the-next-generation-of-wireless/ > >> > >> Whatever the future holds it's going to be interesting .. > >> > >> > >> > >> Sent from my iPhone > >> > >> On Feb 22, 2014, at 7:57 AM, Andre Aubet <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Hi guys, > >> > >> As I study deeper in the 802.11 standards with the CCIE Wireless > training, > >> I realize how smart and how magical the wireless communications can be. > >> I really love RF technologies!!! > >> > >> I recently saw this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4eMBBVG-MNY > >> > >> What is performed in this demonstration is simply amazing. Even with the > >> recent 802.11 standards, you can't dream to achieve such a performance. > >> They are able to concurrently run 4x Full-HD + 2x 4k streams!!! I'm > really > >> fascinated by this new technology :) > >> > >> But then I wonder, what will be the future made of? Do you believe this > >> new pCell technology can be seen as the future by ISPs? And how the > Wifi vs > >> LTE or 5G will evolve? > >> > >> I'm interested to hear your thoughts about this topic. > >> > >> Andre. > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos :: > >> > >> iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc > > -------------- next part -------------- > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > > URL: > </archives/ccie_wireless/attachments/20140222/045ec22d/attachment-0001.html> > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 5 > > Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 15:04:11 +0000 > > From: "Jay Killion (jakillio)" <[email protected]> > > To: "[email protected]" > > <[email protected]> > > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Wireless] Joining ACS to AD > > Message-ID: <cf2e1888.15349%[email protected]> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > > > Hi all - > > > > I'm having trouble adding ACS to AD, any tips would be appreciated. > When I go to 'External Identity Stores / Active Directory' in ACS, I enter > the AD name and credentials then 'test'. It always comes back with "can > not resolve network address". > > > > However, from ACS command line I can ping the domain name and it both > resolves and pings without issue. What should I check next? I don't > understand why I am able to resolve the name fine from CLI but the GUI > won't. > > > > Thanks - > > > > Jay Killion, CCIE #17873 R/S > > -------------- next part -------------- > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > > URL: > </archives/ccie_wireless/attachments/20140222/2bb81de2/attachment.html> > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos :: > > > > iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc > > > > End of CCIE_Wireless Digest, Vol 58, Issue 81 > > ********************************************* > _______________________________________________ > Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos :: > > iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc >
_______________________________________________ Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos :: iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
