Interesting idea, and it would probably work, but then each time I want to 
expand this scheme to build from another branch (which eventually may be 5 or 
6) I need to have yet another project, rather that just an additional 
permissible dynamic value.  I can't believe there isn't a better way to do this.

- Justin


On Feb 23, 2010, at 11:47 PM, Ruben Willems wrote:

> Hi
> 
> you can use the pre-processor to reduce the duplication
> http://confluence.public.thoughtworks.org/display/CCNET/Configuration+Preprocessor
> 
> 
> with kind regards
> Ruben Willems
> 
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Justin Kagan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Because in every other regard they are identical.  I don't want the 
> maintenance headache of having to maintain multiple project configurations 
> when we need to tweak something in the future.
> 
> 
>> On Feb 23, 2010 3:16 AM, "Ruben Willems" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi
>> 
>> why not set up 2 CCnet projects?
>> 
>> 1 for the release branch
>> 1 for the beta branch
>> each has its own labeller --> makes it more easy
>> 
>> and with 1.5 this allows also for easier security administration
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> with kind regards
>> Ruben Willems
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 4:18 AM, jekagan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hey all,
>> >
>> > I'm trying to...
>> 
> 

Reply via email to