Hi this is being integrated into trunk now so in the 1.6 you have this. Do not know the current state of the import, if it is 100% done or not
with kind regards Ruben Willems On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Rémi Royer <[email protected]> wrote: > Maybe this will help you. > > http://ccnetconditional.codeplex.com/ > > > > On 24 fév, 10:46, Justin Kagan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Interesting idea, and it would probably work, but then each time I want > to expand this scheme to build from another branch (which eventually may be > 5 or 6) I need to have yet another project, rather that just an additional > permissible dynamic value. I can't believe there isn't a better way to do > this. > > > > - Justin > > > > On Feb 23, 2010, at 11:47 PM, Ruben Willems wrote: > > > > > Hi > > > > > you can use the pre-processor to reduce the duplication > > >http://confluence.public.thoughtworks.org/display/CCNET/Configuration. > .. > > > > > with kind regards > > > Ruben Willems > > > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Justin Kagan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Because in every other regard they are identical. I don't want the > maintenance headache of having to maintain multiple project configurations > when we need to tweak something in the future. > > > > >> On Feb 23, 2010 3:16 AM, "Ruben Willems" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > >> Hi > > > > >> why not set up 2 CCnet projects? > > > > >> 1 for the release branch > > >> 1 for the beta branch > > >> each has its own labeller --> makes it more easy > > > > >> and with 1.5 this allows also for easier security administration > > > > >> with kind regards > > >> Ruben Willems > > > > >> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 4:18 AM, jekagan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> > Hey all, > > > > >> > I'm trying to... > > > -- > To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject. >
