Easy - I'm English *grin*

http://www3.telus.net/linguisticsissues/BritishCanadianAmerican.htm

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Daniel Nauck
Sent: Monday, 15 March 2010 11:43 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ccnet-user] SvnRevisionLabeler

Hi,

looks like the "labeller"-typo is very very old ;)
I dont know if this has some special meaning, etc ... maybe dave knows this.

Daniel

Am 15.03.2010 09:54, schrieb Essl, Markus:
Hello Daniel!

Thanks, I'll try that out. Actually, I thought this labeller would get it's 
information from an assembly, not provide a format that is usable for 
assemblies.

Another note:  My spellchecker always wants to correct 'labeller' to 'labeler' 
- could someone shed some light on this?

Markus



Von: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Daniel Nauck
Gesendet: Sonntag, 14. März 2010 15:06
An: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Betreff: Re: [ccnet-user] SvnRevisionLabeler

Hello,

you can switch to the build-in AssemblyVersionLabeller [1] if you like. It also 
uses the svn revision number.

Daniel

[1] 
http://confluence.public.thoughtworks.org/display/CCNET/Assembly+Version+Labeller

Am 11.03.2010 18:12, schrieb Essl, Markus:
Hello!

I am using the current nightly of the 1.5 branch and was using the "svn 
revision labeler"  to give my build a label that includes the svn revision 
number. But it looks to me like it does not work anymore correcty - it seems 
that the labeler is called before the source code is updated, where in the 1.4 
it was called afterwards - or I did not look carefully enough and only 
recognized that just now. So how is the flow?

a)
[Check For Modification] -> [Labeler] -> [Update Repository] -> [Tasks] -> 
[Publishers]

b)
[Check For Modification] -> [Update Repository] -> [Labeler] -> [Tasks] -> 
[Publishers]

Thanks,
Markus

Markus Essl
Abteilungsleiter Softwareentwicklung


The information contained in this e-mail message and any accompanying files is 
or may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, 
dissemination, reliance, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail or any 
attached files is unauthorised. This e-mail is subject to copyright. No part of 
it should be reproduced, adapted or communicated without the written consent of 
the copyright owner. If you have received this e-mail in error please advise 
the sender immediately by return e-mail or telephone and delete all copies. 
Fairfax does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information 
contained in this e-mail or attached files. Internet communications are not 
secure, therefore Fairfax does not accept legal responsibility for the contents 
of this message or attached files.

Reply via email to