***  For details on how to be removed from this list visit the  ***
***          CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk         ***


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello Mario,

it is not an answer to your question, but with 3degreess mosaicity and 0.1
degrees slices, you may want to try XDS, too, to integrate your data
( I think it is usually a good idea to use more than one integration
program for comparison).

Tim

- --
Tim Gruene
Institut fuer anorganische Chemie
Tammannstr. 4
D-37077 Goettingen

GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A


On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Mario Sanches wrote:

> ***  For details on how to be removed from this list visit the  ***
> ***          CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk         ***
>
>
> I am integrating two datasets using mosflm and in both cases the program seems
> to underestimate the mosaicity. I tried to use the option POSTREF MOSADD X, as
> mentioned on the manual, but the mosaicities either keep refining to a lower
> value or diverge to an excessively high number.
>
> Those are derivatives datasets, both in C2. The first one has a normal 
> mosaicity
> of about 0.7. The second has a very high mosaicity of about 3.0 (or so I 
> think)
> and was collected in fine slices of 0.1 degree. In both cases I was able to
> integrate fixing the mosaicity, but with a few problems (the normal plot 
> doesn't
> look very nice, for example). Here are my questions:
>
> 1. How to tell mosflm to refine the mosaicity on a value higuer than the
> initially estimated one? As I told, I tried varying the POSTREF MOSADD X 
> without
> success. The mosaicity seems to change slightly from image to image, so I 
> would
> like to properly refine this parameter.
>
> 2. In the second dataset with mosaicity around 3 the program rejects about 
> half
> of the reflexion which are to wide in phi. Is there any way to keep some of
> those reflexions or those  might be rejected?
>
> 3. In this fine sliced/high mosaic dataset the Rmerge per image (SCALA) tend 
> to
> be  higher than usual. Is that normal in this case?
>
> 4. How should one interpret the anomalous plot outputted by SCALA?
>
> If anyone want to take a look at some images I will be more than happy to
> provide them.
>
> Sincerely,
> --
> Mario Sanches, Ph.D.
> Brazilian Synchrotron Light Laboratory
> Structural Molecular Biology Center
> Crystallography and Spectroscopy of Biomolecules
>
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDKmqXUxlJ7aRr7hoRAhshAKDmlnZEBP4UcY0QRFmGNasWth9zHwCg2RTk
Nsh261mdX7Za21G1V0RW8es=
=86Hh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to