***  For details on how to be removed from this list visit the  ***
***          CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk         ***



[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 05/02/2006 05:14:00 PM:

> ***  For details on how to be removed from this list visit the  ***
> ***          CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk         ***
>
>
> Hi,
> I Have a question about permuting crystal indices. When I compare two
> crystal data sets to get crossR value to know how isomorphous they
> are, I need to permute the indices of one of the crystal. Both of my
> crystals have space group P212121. I was told to permute HKL to LKH,
> HLK, and KHL. I do not have a clear mind the principle. For example,
> by whole arrangement, there will be 6 possibilities for the
> permutation. Why only four exist here? The second question is more
> important: if I want to change from HKL to KHL, the new indices are
> (0 -1 0    -1 0 0    0 0 -1), not (0 1 0  1 0 0   0 0 1).  Why there
> is minus sign in the indices?
>
> Could anyone recommend me one paper or book to read to solve my puzzle?
>
> Your help is greatly appreciated!

Hi Qun -

To permute the axes of your orthorhombic system, you need to preserve the
handedness of your axes, i.e. you must be able to rotate one set of axes
onto the other.  This means you only have three choices: HKL, KLH, and LHK.
The other three choices (including KHL) invert the coordinate system, thus
reversing the sign of any anomalous signal you might have (I+ and I- get
swapped).

However, I should point out that there should be only one consistent choice
of your axes.  If your reference dataset has a=40 A, b=65 A, and c=100 A,
then all other datasets should be permuted to give the same set of abc.  So
you don't need to test all three, and if you used the same indexing program
for all your data you shouldn't need to reindex at all.

As for your second question, the matrix you gave converts H,K,L ->
-K,-H,-L.  You can then flip this upside down (H,K,L -> K,H,-L) and rotate
it 180 degrees about the c axis (H,K,L -> -H,-K,L) to give you the matrix
you were looking for, i.e. they're equivalent.  However, you shouldn't be
using this matrix anyway...

Sorry I don't have a paper to point you to.

- Matt

--
Matthew Franklin                     phone:(917)606-4116
Senior Scientist, ImClone Systems      fax:(212)645-2054
180 Varick Street, 6th floor
New York, NY 10014


Confidentiality Note:  This e-mail, and any attachment to it, contains
privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the
individual(s) or entity named on the e-mail.  If the reader of this e-mail
is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for
delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
reading it is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this e-mail in
error, please immediately return it to the sender and delete it from your
system.  Thank you.

Reply via email to