*** For details on how to be removed from this list visit the ***
*** CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk ***
On Jul 18, 2006, at 10:13 PM, Edward A. Berry wrote:
The R values look fine, even considering redundancy is only 2 in the
second scaling.
In this procedure, redundancy can only be maximum 2 in the second
scaling step ((0=both I+ and I- unobserved, 1=either I+ or I-
unobserved, 2=both I+ and I- observed) for each reflection).
Yi Xue wrote:
Hi, all:
I collected Cu-MAD data, I tried to detect anomalous signals using
scalepack.
I followed tutorial: first: scale data with 'anomalous'
checked, and chi
square around 1.
second: turn off 'anomalous' flag, and
merge I+ and
I-.
Output is as follows:
This test is OK but not the most sensitive or the easiest to interpret.
I would suggest you run it through either XPREP, SHELXC or xtriage
(http://www.phenix-online.org/tutorials/text/xtriage.html) instead.
Cheers,
Martin
