Note: forwarded message attached.
Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Yahoo! Small Business.
--- Begin Message ---
Note: forwarded message attached.
Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Yahoo! Small Business.--- Begin Message --- Hi Veronica,
have a look at this paper:
Jameson et al., Acta D58, 955, 2002
may be this helps
kanchan
--------------------------------------------------------------
Veronica Tamu Dufe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:*** For details on how to be removed from this list visit the ***
*** CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk ***
Dear All
I have a twinned data with a twin fraction of 0.467549. The resolution of the data is 3Å. I have a molecular replacement solution from phaser and assigned the free R reflections using thin shells in shelxpro.
Since I have 4 molecules per asu, I thought that refining it with the NCSY command in shelxl could circumvent the low resolution as suggested in the shelxl manual.
I did a rigid body refinment with BLOC 1, AFIX 6 and AFIX 0 (after each chain). TWIN matrix and BASF using LS and removing the BUMP.
I get the following :
R1 = 0.3850
Rfree = 0.4197
wR2 = 0.7337
for all data.
When I do restraint refinement (ie coordinates and isotropic B-factors) using CGLS, removing the AFIX and BUMP, reducing the SIMU, and DEFS values I get a large difference (20) between Rfree and R1 indicating that the data is being overfitted. Using the default values for SIMU and DEFS does not help.
Has anybody succeded in refining twinned data to this low resolution with shelxl and how can I get it to work in my case considering that I will use NCS?
Thank you all in advance
Veronica
---------------------------------------------
Tamu Dufe Veronica, PhD Student
Molecular Biophysics
Center for Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Getingevagen 60
Lund University
P.O.B. 124
SE-22100 Lund
SWEDEN
Tel: +46462224513
Do you Yahoo!?
Get on board. You're invited to try the new Yahoo! Mail.
--- End Message ---
--- End Message ---
