*** For details on how to be removed from this list visit the *** *** CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk ***
Hi Evette, you say that your native data set extends to 1.4 angs but you somehow are not sure about your space group. I would have expected that you would have enough information along the 00L reciprocal axis to decide between a C222 or a C2221. Given that C2221 occurs overwhelmingly more frequently than C222, I am wondering whether your crystal is really a C2221 cell and whether you are missing several strong reflections along the 00L due to your data collection. This could especially impair the effectiveness of your translation-function searches. best regards, Savvas -----Original Message----- From: "Radisky, Evette S. Ph.D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 11:50:59 -0600 Subject: [ccp4bb]: Best bet for a molecular replacement problem Dear all, In the past I have only ever used epmr for molecular replacement, and have never encountered any tough cases where that didn't work. I have never before had to deal with multiple copies in the asymmetric unit. I am now struggling to solve the structure of a complex between A (a 24 kDa protein) and B (a 6.5 kDa protein). My native data set extends to 1.4A resolution; space group is C222 or C2221. For models, I have a 1.7A structure of A alone, and a 1.6A structure of B alone. Unit cell analysis suggests that there should be 2 copies of the A-B complex in the asymmetric unit. (Although the affinity between A and B is not that great, and it is possible that I have crystallized A alone or B alone; eg, there could be 3 copies of A and no B in the asymmetric unit.) So far, epmr has failed me, and I spent the weekend reading up on Phaser documentation and trying it out, still with no success. For those programs, I was trying both possible space groups, and trying to search with both models as pieces of the complete model, as well as trying to search with my A model alone, for 2 or 3 copies. I am now reading up on Molrep and have started an auto MR run; I guess I will try the DYAD option next (as mentioned in a recent posting) if the first run doesn't give a solution. A couple of questions about this: in using the DYAD=D option for Molrep, how should I choose appropriate choices for "number of peaks" variables NP, NPT, and NPTD? And in setting the variables refering to the model, if I am searching for A alone, is my "fraction completeness of model" 0.8 (80% of one A-B complex) or 0.4 (40% of the contents of the asymmetric unit)? I would also welcome any input about these or other favorite programs and approaches for situations like this one. Also, I find that program documentation often doesn't give a lot of guidance for selection of best options and variables, so any hints on those that may be critical for my situation would also help. Thanks! Evette Evette S. Radisky, Ph.D. Assistant Professor and Associate Consultant II Mayo Clinic Cancer Center Griffin Cancer Research Building, Rm 310 4500 San Pablo Road Jacksonville, FL 32224 (904) 953-6372 (office) (904) 953-2857 (lab) ________________________________________ Nicholas Noinaj University of Kentucky College of Medicine Department of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry The Center for Structural Biology Biomedical Biological Sciences Research Building, Rm 236 741 S. Limestone Lexington, Ky 40536 Lab: 859-323-8183 Cell: 859-893-4789 Home: 859-228-0978 [EMAIL PROTECTED] noinaj.com
