Could someone point me to some standards for data quality, especially for 
publishing structures? I'm wondering in particular about highest shell 
completeness, multiplicity, sigma and Rmerge.

A co-worker pointed me to a '97 article by Kleywegt and Jones:

http://xray.bmc.uu.se/gerard/gmrp/gmrp.html

"To decide at which shell to cut off the resolution, we nowadays tend to use 
the following criteria for the highest shell: completeness > 80 %, multiplicity 
> 2, more than 60 % of the reflections with I > 3 sigma(I), and Rmerge < 40 %. 
In our opinion, it is better to have a good 1.8 Å structure, than a poor 1.637 
Å structure."

Are these recommendations still valid with maximum likelihood methods? We tend 
to use more data, especially in terms of the Rmerge and sigma cuttoff.

Thanks in advance,

Shane Atwell

Reply via email to