That is very very peculiar!

as far as I know REFMAC doesnt really care whether you call something ATOM or HETATM . I suspect the problem is either in the cif file describing the co-factor - could the atom type fpr MO be set as N? or possibly in the PDB file - is the Atom name displaced to the left, and is the atom type (last columns) set to MO?

Eleanor

James Pauff wrote:
Good morning/day/evening all,

I have a structure that is refined, with the exception
of the molybdenum (MoOOS) cofactors (there are two of
them), which are square pyramidal and coordinated to 2
sulfurs in an enedithiolate of a pterin ring.  I have
brought up my issues with refining this before in
REFMAC, but something just dawned on me as I work
through/with it.

Although I define the Mo, O1, O2, S atoms as ATOM
records in the PDB, with restrained refinement in
REFMAC, the resulting *_refmac1.pdb file converts the
MO to a N.  If I define the 4 atoms above as HETATM
records, the same happens with the output PDB,
changing all 4 atoms back to ATOM records and
redefining the MO as N.

I am also still getting problems with the connectivity
of the atoms in the coordination sphere of the
molybdenum, but that may be a side issue to this
confusing problem with the record lines in my output
PDBs here.

Thank you,
Jim


____________________________________________________________________________________
Building a website is a piece of cake. Yahoo! Small Business gives you all the 
tools to get online.
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/webhosting

Reply via email to