Oryxnano 50+50 nL
Demetres
Which, indirectly, brings up an interesting (but not relevant to the
Oryx) question.
Nucleation is a process that does have a stochastic aspect.
Thus, one could argue that compromising to 200-300 nl might be better
than either extremes of 50nl (too small volume and less chance for
nucleation) or 1000 nl (too much sample).
any comments ? (let the flames begin).
A.
PS1
another interesting issue that has has been hardly touched in these
emails is the real sample loss: left in wells and not easy to
recover, lost because of contamination with system liquid, etc ...
PS2
I see lots of people with new robots. please do have a look at the
www.BIOXHIT.org page and if you have a few minutes to assemble a
table we will be happy to add your specs to our pages. it can be a
nice resource and it has already enough things and already one
response to my last email ;-) To make life easier to potential
contributors we can provide an Excel sheet to fill up with your specs
- just ask.
On Jan 16, 2008, at 12:46, Demetres D. Leonidas wrote:
David Briggs wrote:
I'll defend the honour of the phoenix... (again)
Bernhard Rupp 100+100 nl
Dave Briggs (and all users at Univ of Manchester, UK) 100+100nl
Others..
Only time we have ANY problems is when the nano dispensing tip
gets clogged. Often a good wash whilst still on the machine will
clear the blockage.
Dave
--
============================
David C. Briggs PhD
Father & Crystallographer
http://www.dbriggs.talktalk.net <http://www.dbriggs.talktalk.net>
AIM ID: dbassophile
============================
--
Demetres D. Leonidas, Ph.D.
Structural Biology & Chemistry Group
Institute of Organic and Pharmaceutical Chemistry
The National Hellenic Research Foundation
48, Vassileos Constantinou Avenue
Athens 116 35, Greece
==================================================
Tel. +30 210 7273841 (office)
+30 210 7273895 (lab) Fax. +30 210 7273831
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL: http://athena.eie.gr
==================================================
