You're not the only one to have had exactly that problem with
exactly that system!  

A good ad for the potential utility of JDF (Journal of Dismal
Failure).

  Phoebe


---- Original message ----
>Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 19:20:58 -0400
>From: [email protected]  
>Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Crystallizing Fluorescent Molecules  
>To: [email protected]
>
>CCP4 bulletin board <[email protected]> wrote on
05/14/2009 03:42:05
>PM:
>
>> Dear Crystallographers,
>>
>> I have exactly two spherulite crystals of a protein-peptide
complex which
>
>> have a fluorescently-labelled peptide in them, and are
therefore nicely
>> colorful in both the light and fluorescence microscopes,
making it easier
>to
>> know that at least the peptide is in the crystal. However,
they are not
>> reproducible. Having gone through the usual list of
possible variations
>> which might account for the irreproducibility, I have hit
the bottom of
>the
>> barrel. I was thinking that since the original crystals
grew in utter
>> darkness, undisturbed for two weeks while I was away, they
were able to
>> nucleate. Is it possible that light exciting the
fluorophores is
>detrimental
>> to crystallization? Or perhaps the complete uniformity of
temperature?
>Even
>> microseeding from one of the spherulites produced nothing
(except in the
>> original well.) Any brilliant suggestions welcome...
>>
>> Jacob Keller
>>
>
>Hi Jacob -
>
>I just want to raise a warning, since a very similar
situation bit me back
>in grad school.  I was trying to crystallize RecA with a
>fluorescently-labeled oligo, and just like you, I got
green-glowing
>crystals, along with some glowing precipitate.  I got
extremely excited,
>and  a couple of months later had the structure done.  There
was no DNA in
>the structure.  I had crystallized unliganded RecA, and the
fluorescent DNA
>had precipitated all over the outside of the crystal,
painting it and
>making it look green!
>
>Are you certain that your peptide doesn't precipitate under your
>crystallization conditions?  I hope for your sake that my
problem is not
>yours...
>
>- Matt
>
>
>--
>Matthew Franklin , Ph.D.
>Senior Scientist, ImClone Systems,
>a wholly owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly & Company
>180 Varick Street, 6th floor
>New York, NY 10014
>phone:(917)606-4116   fax:(212)645-2054
>
>
>Confidentiality Note:  This e-mail, and any attachment to it,
contains
>privileged and confidential information intended only for the
use of the
>individual(s) or entity named on the e-mail.  If the reader
of this e-mail
>is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent
responsible for
>delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that
>reading it is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this
e-mail in
>error, please immediately return it to the sender and delete
it from your
>system.  Thank you.
Phoebe A. Rice
Assoc. Prof., Dept. of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
The University of Chicago
phone 773 834 1723
http://bmb.bsd.uchicago.edu/Faculty_and_Research/01_Faculty/01_Faculty_Alphabetically.php?faculty_id=123

RNA is really nifty
DNA is over fifty
We have put them 
  both in one book
Please do take a 
  really good look
http://www.rsc.org/shop/books/2008/9780854042722.asp

Reply via email to