I uploaded an archive( pdf of emails plus text log files) of all the conversations that took place around Eleanor Dodsons Original thread on 08/17/07 discussing the 2HR0 structure along with the attached log files to an archive available at
http://harijaycrystdata.s3.amazonaws.com/ccp4bb_archive_thread_withlogfiles_08_17_07_2HR0.zip I tried to get the threads with attached logs to a single link using other email thread viewers , but in the end put it into the above file using gmail . Since I missed most of the original discussion, re-reading it was very enlightening. Hope this helps Hari Jayaram On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 4:19 AM, Tommi Kajander <[email protected]>wrote: > Would the exact analysis of how each of these things were wrong and > fabricated be somewhere > available???? Would be fair (apart from the known case of C3b) to have the > whole analysis available > instead of just this kind of news feed. I suspect its not obvious by five > minute check in all cases. > > Perhaps there needs to be ways within PDB in form of automated tools that > would raise those red > flags in suspicious cases (e.g. some data analysis --such as the > contribution by solvent etc now that data beyond 8Å > is by default used in refinement) - as it appears peer review/editing by > journals isn't/cant always be(?) stringent enough. > > In any case, some type of automated analysis of the whole data base might > be a good idea, as there can be > other cases (with another couple of thousand papers citing them..). > > tommi > > On Dec 10, 2009, at 4:16 PM, Ibrahim Moustafa wrote: > > "After a thorough examination of the available data, which included a >> re-analysis of each structure alleged to have been fabricated, the >> committee >> found a preponderance of evidence that structures 1BEF, 1CMW, 1DF9/2QID, >> 1G40, 1G44, 1L6L, 2OU1, 1RID, 1Y8E, 2A01, and 2HR0 were more likely than >> not >> falsified and/or fabricated and recommended that they be removed from the >> public record," the university said in its statement this week." >> >
