The 2nd peak is a shoulder of the origin peak at 1.0 0 0 so should be ignored..

The 3rd peak is 16% of the origin - rather marginal I would say. So I dont think there is clear evidence of translational NCS

Eleanor


Sylvia Fanucchi wrote:
Morning all

Apologies for the simple question. I have a structure I would like to
solve using molecular replacement. I am a bit confused by the patterson
peaks. There appears to be a large non-origin peak (although it is
apparently symmetry-related to the origin?). Does this mean that there
is some translation occurring in the asymmetric unit? Or is there
non-crystallographic symmetry? Does anyone know what I should do to
address this? I have continued with the molecular replacement as normal
and did not get a solution with Phaser. Molrep gives a solution that
appears correct based on the maps and refines reasonably well.

Count Site Height        Grid         Fractional coordinates
Orthogonal coordinates

   1    1        100.00     0   0   0   0.0000  0.0000  0.0000     0.00
0.00   0.00

   2    1         67.16    33   0   0   0.9706  0.0000  0.0000    41.11
0.00   0.00

   3    2         16.59    10   0   2   0.3070  0.0000  0.0304    13.00
0.00   2.51

   4    3         16.54    24   0   2   0.6920  0.0000  0.0317    29.30
0.00   2.63

   5    4         14.24    17   0   3   0.5034  0.0000  0.0447    21.31
0.00   3.70

   6    5         14.19    20   0   3   0.5763  0.0000  0.0507    24.40
0.00 4.20
Best regards

Sylvia Fanucchi Ph.D

Protein Structure-Function Research Unit
East Campus, Gate House Room 416
School of Molecular and Cell Biology
University of the Witwatersrand
Johannesburg 2050
South Africa

Tel: +27 (11) 717-6348 Fax: +27 (11) 717-6351 E-mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

<html><p><font face = "verdana" size = "0.8" color = "navy">This communication is intended for 
the addressee only. It is confidential. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and destroy the original 
message. You may not copy or disseminate this communication without the permission of the University. Only authorized signatories are competent 
to enter into agreements on behalf of the University and recipients are thus advised that the content of this message may not be legally binding 
on the University and may contain the personal views and opinions of the author, which are not necessarily the views and opinions of The 
University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. All agreements between the University and outsiders are subject to South African Law unless the 
University agrees in writing to the contrary.</font></p></html>

Reply via email to