Hi Kevin: Thanks! Could you explain why the DM (NCS concerned) input should be Fo/PHIC/WCMB instead of FWT/PHIC? I thought DM is just a real-space phase improvement method, and the latter (FWT/PHIC) suffers less from model bias...
Best Regards, Hailiang > Hailiang Zhang wrote: >> If I have the model phase PHIC, exp Fo, and sigmaa-weighted FWT, is that >> more reasonable to use Fo/PHIC or FWT/PHIC as the input of CCP4-DM? > > You want Fo, sigFo, PHIC and the FOM from sigmaa or refmac. > > You might want to try parrot as well. If you feed it your MR model it > will use this to get the NCS operators and do NCS averaging > automatically (dm requires a load of matrices). > > Kevin > > -- > EMAIL DISCLAIMER http://www.york.ac.uk/docs/disclaimer/email.htm > >
