On 10-10-14 01:34 PM, Ethan Merritt wrote:
My simple/simplistic mental picture for this is that electrons form a cloud surrounding the atom's nucleus. The larger the diameter of the cloud the more strongly the atomic scattering factor decreases with resolution (just like increased B-factors spread out the electrons and reduce scattering). Anomalous scattering is based on the inner electron orbitals that are much closer to the nucleus and thus their scattering declines more slowly with resolution. By this reasoning f' and f" would still decline with resolution but perhaps the difference is so substantial that within the resolution ranges we work with they can be considered constant. By the same reasoning you'd expect neutron diffraction to have scattering factors that are for all practical purposes independent of resolution, assuming b-factors of zero. In addition, the different fall-off in the scattering factors for f0 and f' or f" will be much less noticeable for anomalous scatters with high B-values where the latter dominates the 3D distribution of the electrons. Bart ============================================================================ Bart Hazes (Associate Professor) Dept. of Medical Microbiology & Immunology University of Alberta 1-15 Medical Sciences Building Edmonton, Alberta Canada, T6G 2H7 phone: 1-780-492-0042 fax: 1-780-492-7521 ============================================================================ |
- Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (... Lijun Liu
- Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing quest... Jacob Keller
- Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing q... Lijun Liu
- Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing q... James Holton
- Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasi... Dale Tronrud
- Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasi... Jacob Keller
- Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasi... Bart Hazes
- Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasi... Lijun Liu
- Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasi... Ethan Merritt
- Re: [ccp4bb] [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassin... Ethan Merritt
- Re: [ccp4bb] [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassin... Bart Hazes
- Re: [ccp4bb] [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassin... Ethan Merritt
- Re: [ccp4bb] [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassin... Jacob Keller
- Re: [ccp4bb] [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassin... Tim Gruene
- Re: [ccp4bb] [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassin... Felix Frolow
- Re: [ccp4bb] [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassin... Ethan Merritt
- Re: [ccp4bb] [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassin... William G. Scott
- Re: [ccp4bb] [QUAR] Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassin... James Holton
- Re: [ccp4bb] embarrassingly simple MAD phasing question (... Bernhard Rupp