No cutoffs in Scala Phil On 8 Feb 2011, at 20:13, Kay Diederichs wrote:
> Hi Simon, > > I've put my answer into the XDSwiki article "FAQ" > <http://strucbio.biologie.uni-konstanz.de/xdswiki/index.php/FAQ#why_do_the_latest_XDS.2FXSCALE_versions_only_give_a_single_table.2C_with_I.2Fsigma.3E.3D-3_cutoff.3F> > because I was asked this privately a couple of times, after this was changed > for the May 2010 version. > > In short, the table describes the data that are written out by XDS/XSCALE, > and giving more than one table obscures this fact and tends to confuse users > ("which table should I use?" - "the -3 sigma cutoff table" - "then why are > there the others?"). > > Others have already mentioned in this thread that SCALEPACK uses the same > cutoff of -3 sigma. I'm not sure about the cutoff in MOSFLM/SCALA. > > I do realize now that some people have been using the tables for deciding on > a suitable resolution cutoff. With a bit of scripting, this can be overcome - > pls ask me by email. > > hope that helps, > > Kay > > Am 08.02.2011 20:58, schrieb Simon Kolstoe: >> Dear ccp4bb, >> >> I am quite a fan of XDS and have just upgraded to the latest version. >> >> Normally, to assess the quality of my data, I look at the tables in >> CORRECT.LP and especially the table "SUBSET OF INTENSITY DATA WITH >> SIGNAL/NOISE >= 0.0 AS FUNCTION OF RESOLUTION". >> >> However in my latest run I only get a single table for all the data >> i.e. for signal/noise >= -3.0. Is there a command I can put in my >> XDS.INP that will give me all the other tables or has the CORRECT.LP >> logfile been altered in the most recent version of XDS? >> >> (FYI my xds.inp obtained from the ESRF last week is copied below) >> >> Thanks, >> >> Simon >>
