Hi, I was wondering if anyone knows what HKL 2000 does? Does it merge all partials and treat it as one, because often times I noticed with increase in partials the redundancy increases.
Shya On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 1:24 PM, James Holton <[email protected]> wrote: > At the risk of asking a question to which I should already know the answer: > > do partials "count" as "redundancy"? > > That is, in SCALA, is the number of "observations" the number of recorded > spots? Or is it the number of recorded spots after adding partials? If it > is the latter, what happens if you collect more than 360 degrees of data? > Does the second pass through a given unmerged hkl index count as "more > partials" or is it now somehow upgraded to an "independent" observation? > > Then again, in Eastern English the word "redundancy" has a negative > connotation, and the output of SCALA actually uses the word "multiplicity". > I wonder if that makes unmerged partials "redundant"? > > -James Holton > MAD Scientist > > > On 7/15/2011 8:09 AM, Ed Pozharski wrote: > >> On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 09:26 +0100, Phil Evans wrote: >> >>> Ed. You could count them from the unmerged output as you say, or I >>> could make you a special version of SCALA or Aimless maybe next week >>> >>> Phil, >> >> that would be fantastic! Hope there is broader interest in such option >> (beyond Robbie and myself). I'll try unmerged output in the meantime. >> >> Ed. >> >>
