For some ideas on this see my presentation to the last CCP4 study weekend (with some further ideas in Acta D, to be published):
http://www.cse.scitech.ac.uk/events/CCP4_2011/talks/tickle.pdf Cheers -- Ian On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Jacob Keller < j-kell...@fsm.northwestern.edu> wrote: > On the surface it doesn't seem as bad as others, i.e., it does not > seem to be a real fake--perhaps just a strong form of wishful thinking > and creative density interpretation. I wonder what would be a good > metric in which to establish a cutoff for present/not present in > density. CC, maybe? > > Jacob > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 4:01 PM, David Schuller <dj...@cornell.edu> wrote: > > Time to fuel up the gossip engines for the approaching weekend: > > > > > > http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096921260800186X > > > > RETRACTED: Structure of the Parathyroid Hormone Receptor C Terminus Bound > to > > the G-Protein Dimer Gβ1γ2 > > Structure, Volume 16, Issue 7, 9 July 2008, Pages 1086-1094 > > Structure 2QNS withdrawn. > > > > -- > > ======================================================================= > > All Things Serve the Beam > > ======================================================================= > > David J. Schuller > > modern man in a post-modern world > > MacCHESS, Cornell University > > schul...@cornell.edu > > > > > > -- > ******************************************* > Jacob Pearson Keller > Northwestern University > Medical Scientist Training Program > cel: 773.608.9185 > email: j-kell...@northwestern.edu > ******************************************* >
