-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear ANU,
I cannot follow the link to your picture, but one reason might be different algorithms in the two different programs for the secondary structure prediction. I am usually not too impressed by the suggestions that pymol make and you should always check the secondary structure prediction against your biochemical knowledge, at least to confirm the boundaries. Cheers, Tim On 08/22/2011 03:01 PM, Anuradha Balasubramanian wrote: > Dear all, > > I have a problem . i crystallized same protein in two different pH and when > viewing the results a important beta hairpin seems extended in PyMOL . > (image link below). > https://picasaweb.google.com/anu4884/August222011?authuser=0&feat=directlink > But analysis of hairpin in promotif shows that they are similar with same > H-bonds. > What can be the reason for such ambiguity? > > Regards > > ANU > - -- - -- Dr Tim Gruene Institut fuer anorganische Chemie Tammannstr. 4 D-37077 Goettingen GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFOUmGnUxlJ7aRr7hoRAmntAKCbLfoH0LWCUb8VZR6QbAhS4+EpxgCfXS9H wqLCwS0veRSFMgDZeE1UMFg= =UeAU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
