On 25 Aug 2011, at 14:12, Gregory Bowman wrote:

> When I try to run ARP/wARP classic for loop building, I get the following 
> message in the logfile:
> 
> QUITTING ... ARP/wARP module stopped with an error message:
> REFMAC

I get the same error running auto_tracing.sh from ARP/wARP 7.2.  (CCP4 6.2.0, 
OS X 10.6.8)

As a work-around getting ARP/wARP to use the refmac binary from 
http://www.ysbl.york.ac.uk/~garib/refmac/data/refmac_experimental/refmac5.6_macintel.tar.gz
 (version 5.6.0119) allows ARP/wARP to run.

Some information that may help work out what the problem is below:

The only helpful error message I get in the logs is:

At line 723 of file 
/sw64/src/fink.build/ccp4-6.2.0-102/ccp4-6.2.0/src/refmac5_/read_extra_restraints.f
 (unit = 9, file = '/tmp/huwtj/refmac5_temp1.53659_BOND_R')
Fortran runtime error: Sequential READ or WRITE not allowed after EOF marker, 
possibly use REWIND or BACKSPACE

 ### CCP4 6.2: Refmac_5.6.0117     version 5.6.0117 : 13/06/11##

QUITTING ... ARP/wARP module stopped with an error message:
REFMAC5

At first I thought this was a 32/64bit issue but after compiling CCP4 as 32bit 
I get exactly the same error:

At line 723 of file 
/sw/src/fink.build/ccp4-6.2.0-102/ccp4-6.2.0/src/refmac5_/read_extra_restraints.f
 (unit = 9, file = '/tmp/huwtj/refmac5_temp1.81086_BOND_R')
Fortran runtime error: Sequential READ or WRITE not allowed after EOF marker, 
possibly use REWIND or BACKSPACE

 ### CCP4 6.2: Refmac_5.6.0117     version 5.6.0117 : 13/06/11##

QUITTING ... ARP/wARP module stopped with an error message:
REFMAC5

In both cases this is CCP4 built/installed by fink on OS X 10.6.8.

When I try to compile refmac from the latest source code with gfortran 4.6.1 I 
get a lot of warnings (which go away if I add -fno-whole-file to XFFLAGS) and 
the executable produced fails in the same way when called by auto_tracing.sh. 
This suggests to me it's a compiler issue not any differences between refmac 
5.6.0117 and 5.6.0119, unfortunately that's about the limit of my 
understanding. 

Hopefully some of that is useful to someone!


Huw

Reply via email to