The problem with fixing the nomenclature "problems" in Coot is that they are back again after the next round of refinement (or at least some of them are, if they are right on the edge of an arbitrary distinction) - indeed irritating Phil
On 9 Jan 2012, at 11:43, Paul Emsley wrote: > On 08/01/12 10:36, ccp4 wrote: >> Won't coot fix the nomenclature issue, then you can check whether you have >> a real chirality problem - eg a squashed flattened VAL.. >> > > It will indeed [1]. So Afshan need only read in the file, Press OK and then > Save. > > Robbie and I think that it is more likely than not that Afshan did not really > have a chirality problem. > > Afshan and Kim have been in touch and confirm that it is the adit validation > report that describes a nomenclature error on a VAL CB as a chirality problem > (rather than anything from CCP4). > > Paul. > > > [1] well, modern ones do [2] > [2] and you can turn it off (some people find the feature annoying)
