Hi Ed,

I am not sure I understand this - perhaps we are talking about different things. Even if by inversion procedure you mean simple calculation of
(2fo-fc)*exp(i*phi), the fc is still technically a product of the
refinement, which unless based on trivial least square target (i.e. no weights) does factor in experimental errors. The (2mFo-DFc) map is even
more obviously dependent on the errors.  Again, I believe that the
differences will be minor, but if one calculates a map with refmac
either with or without factoring in experimental errors, there will be
*some difference*.  Thus, the experimental errors will affect the
resulting map.  Could you please clarify?

Yes, we are talking about different things. I refer to the case that we
have an amplitude term with its uncertainty (no matter whether it is Fo or Fo^2 or Fo-Fc or 2mFo-DFc or ...) plus a phase with its uncertainty. In normal
everyday applications we use FFT which ignores (i) the uncertainties of
both terms, (ii) the missing data. By doing an FFT we produce a map which exactly reproduces the input data (even if they are missing data which are reproduced with an amplitude of zero). What I have been saying is that in
the presence of uncertainties and missing information the data do not
define a single map, but a whole set of maps which are statistically
consistent with the data and the question then arises : 'which map should
I be looking at ?'. I happen to mention the maximum entropy method as a
possible solution to this problem.



I think that we are not comparing ML to no-ML (or maximum entropy), but rather ML inflated by experimental errors vs pure ML that ignores them.
I may be crazy or stupid (or both), but certainly not crazy/stupid
enough to "doubt the importance of maximum likelihood for refinement". (On the other hand, one who promises to never doubt maximum likelihood
shall never use SHELX :)

We definitely talk about different things. My arguments had nothing to do with treatment of errors in refinement. The question I was tackling was how you go from |F|,sig(|F|),phase to a map in the presence of errors and missing
data.


Nicholas


--
            Nicholas M. Glykos, Department of Molecular Biology
     and Genetics, Democritus University of Thrace, University Campus,
Dragana, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece, Tel/Fax (office) +302551030620,
    Ext.77620, Tel (lab) +302551030615, http://utopia.duth.gr/~glykos/

Reply via email to