There is something even better than SEC-MALS--solving the structure!

JPK

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:16 AM, <isabel.de-mor...@diamond.ac.uk> wrote:

> Dear Raji,
>
> The best way to find out is to run a SEC-MALLS  (Size Exclusion
> Chomatography - Multi-Angle Laser Light Scattering) experiment.
>
> Best,
> Isabel
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dr. Isabel De Moraes, MRSC
>
> Membrane Protein Laboratory Facility Co-ordinator
> Membrane Protein Laboratory
> Diamond Light Source Ltd,
> Chilton, Didcot, Oxfordshire,
> OX11 ODE, UK
>
> Tel (direct): 01235 778664
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ________________________________
> From: CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] on behalf of Jacob
> Keller [j-kell...@fsm.northwestern.edu]
> Sent: 21 June 2012 17:11
> To: ccp4bb
> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Detergent and protein oligomerization
>
> First of all, isn't the choice either dimer or trimer, and second, as a
> protein-detergent complex (PDC), it would be very unlikely that a trimer of
> 99 kD would run at 100 kD, although all is fair in love, war, and membrane
> proteins.
>
> JPK
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Raji Edayathumangalam <r...@brandeis.edu
> <mailto:r...@brandeis.edu>> wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Sorry for the non-CCP4 post.
>
> I have a very basic question about detergents, critical micelle
> concentration and behavior on gel filtration.
>
> A 33kDa membrane protein was purified by gel filtration in a buffer
> containing 0.4%(w/v) beta-NG (CMC: 6.5mM) and 0.046%(w/v)LDAO (CMC:
> 0.14mM).  So the concentrations of beta-NG and LDAO in the gel-filtration
> buffer are ~2X and ~14X that of the CMCs of the respective detergents. The
> elution volume of the protein peak (plus detergent) on Superdex200
> corresponds to a molecular mass of 100kDa.
>
> I think that the 100kDa mass above includes contributions from both the
> protein as well as the detergent micelles. If this is correct, is it then
> accurate to try to glean the oligomerization state of the protein (and
> conclude that it is a trimer or tetramer) without taking into account
> detergent micellar mass and its influence on elution volume?
>
> How should one interpret the 100kDa mass estimate from the gel filtration?
>
> Thanks.
> Raji
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Raji Edayathumangalam
> Instructor in Neurology, Harvard Medical School
> Research Associate, Brigham and Women's Hospital
> Visiting Research Scholar, Brandeis University
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> *******************************************
> Jacob Pearson Keller
> Northwestern University
> Medical Scientist Training Program
> email: j-kell...@northwestern.edu<mailto:j-kell...@northwestern.edu>
> *******************************************
>
> --
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or
> privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If
> you are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the
> addressee please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not
> use, copy, retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to
> the e-mail.
> Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and
> not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd.
> Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any
> attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any
> damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be
> transmitted in or with the message.
> Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England
> and Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and
> Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
*******************************************
Jacob Pearson Keller
Northwestern University
Medical Scientist Training Program
email: j-kell...@northwestern.edu
*******************************************

Reply via email to