You may want to have a look at 3ur7 and 3ur8. I have also another example
of a glycohydrolytic enzyme with an N-terminal His-tag sitting in the
active site of a symmetry-related molecule (not deposited yet).

Karolina



On 27/6/2012, "Brad Bennett" <[email protected]> wrote:

>I think it was an N-terminal RGS-type His tag in 3O8Y (human lipoxygenase)
>that mediated crystal contacts with a symmetry related molecule. As I
>recall, this tag composed a B-strand that formed a nice interface with a
>"native" B-strand of the symmetry related molecule. Pretty cool...
>
>-Brad
>
>On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Phoebe Rice <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> With Flp recombinase - DNA complexes, a C-terminal His tag triggered a
>> different (but sadly not better) crystal form, and the His side chains
>> packed against the bases at the end of a neighboring DNA duplex.
>>
>> =====================================
>> Phoebe A. Rice
>> Dept. of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
>> The University of Chicago
>> phone 773 834 1723
>>
>> http://bmb.bsd.uchicago.edu/Faculty_and_Research/01_Faculty/01_Faculty_Alphabetically.php?faculty_id=123
>> http://www.rsc.org/shop/books/2008/9780854042722.asp
>>
>>
>> ---- Original message ----
>> >Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 10:14:58 -0400
>> >From: CCP4 bulletin board <[email protected]> (on behalf of "R. M.
>> Garavito" <[email protected]>)
>> >Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] The effect of His-tag location on crystallization
>> >To: [email protected]
>> >
>> >   Most of the comments you will get will be anecdotal
>> >   in that people will report the successful results
>> >   and do not take the time or effort to characterize
>> >   the less successful results.  This often occurs
>> >   because the tagged portion of the protein is most
>> >   often disordered, even in the best crystals.  Thus,
>> >   other than saying "tagging on this end works, but
>> >   tagging on that end doesn't," there is little more
>> >   you can say.  Each case will be different, and it is
>> >   almost impossible to arrive at any generalized
>> >   conclusion.
>> >   We prefer C-terminal tagged proteins for a number of
>> >   reasons, but if an N-terminally tagged protein
>> >   crystallizes well, so be it.  Of the dozens of N-
>> >   and C-tagged protein structures we have solved in my
>> >   lab and with collaborators, I have only seen one
>> >   case of an ordered His-tag:  the His residues had
>> >   coordinated Cd ions, which proved essential for
>> >   getting good crystals.  However, beyond that there
>> >   was not much more to say.
>> >   For your protein and the resulting crystals, an
>> >   N-terminally tagged protein crystallized well.
>> >    Whether you can draw any more conclusions from
>> >   these results depends on characterizing crystals of
>> >   both N- and C-tagged proteins.  Just assuming that
>> >   the C-tagged protein is trying to crystallize in the
>> >   same or related crystal form as the N-tagged protein
>> >   is an unwarranted assumption without experimental
>> >   evidence to back it up.  That is why most groups
>> >   just run with the winner.
>> >   Cheers,
>> >   Michael
>> >   ****************************************************************
>> >   R. Michael Garavito, Ph.D.
>> >   Professor of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
>> >   603 Wilson Rd., Rm. 513
>> >   Michigan State University
>> >   East Lansing, MI 48824-1319
>> >   Office:  (517) 355-9724     Lab:  (517) 353-9125
>> >   FAX:  (517) 353-9334
>> >    Email:  [email protected]
>> >   ****************************************************************
>> >   On Jun 26, 2012, at 9:06 PM, weliu wrote:
>> >
>> >     Dear all,
>> >
>> >     We crystallized a protein and found that crystal
>> >     quality greatly depended on the location of
>> >     His-tag. When a His-tag was added at the
>> >     C-terminus, only crystalline precipitate or
>> >     spherical quasi crystals were grown. However, when
>> >     the His-tag was moved to the N-terminus, single
>> >     crystals were grown under a number of conditions,
>> >     and the best one diffracted to 1.7 angstrom after
>> >     optimization. I was wondering if there were
>> >     published reports describing similar cases.
>> >
>> >     Thank you in advance
>> >
>> >     Wei Liu
>>

Reply via email to