Dear All,

Recently I collected one data set for the protein having SG P222 with a= 36.8, 
b= 44.7, c= 78.4(reported with compound). I crystallized the protein with same 
kind of other compound. The diffraction was up to 2.3A. But I am facing problem 
during indexing. I tried with SGP222 (as reported) but the cell dimension was 
showing a= 41.5, b= 96.3, c= 112.7 and distortion index around 9.83% whereas 
for SGP2 its showing a= 96.3, b= 41.5, c= 112.7 with distortion index 0.03%. 
All spots are taken nicely (Denzo). But with P222 predicted spots are 
completely different than the real one. So I processed it in P2. Surprisingly 
when I put the reported SGP222 and cell dimensions during scaling (scalepack), 
for the same data integrated in P2 (just for curiosity), it is showing better 
data statistics than P2. Anybody experienced this situation? Am I doing any 
mistake during indexing? Asking for the suggestions.

Thanks in advance.

Regards,
Dipankar



Aurigene Discovery Technologies Limited,
#39-40 KIADB Industrial Area, Electronic City, Phase II,
Hosur Road, Bangalore- 560 100, India
Cell: +91-9538631469  | Office Ph  : +91 80-66204422 (Extn: 398)  | Email ID: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>


________________________________

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole use of the 
intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged 
information.If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by 
reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.Any unauthorized 
review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding,printing or copying of this 
email or any action taken in reliance on this e-mail is strictly prohibited and 
may be unlawful.

Visit us at http://www.aurigene.com

Reply via email to