Herman,
I don't know which early days you refer to, but from late 80s until structural
genomics era there were relatively few crystallization reports. May be I didn't
see them, and then I apologize. But crystallization reports in large started in
late 90s through early 21st century and Acta F has been created to accommodate
them. As far as my understanding goes, you publish crystallization results only
if you're sure the structure will be solved or is already solved but not ready
for different reasons to be published.
Some time ago I was in position similar to Christine's. And I waited and waited
until I decided to contact the authors of the notes. Sure enough, they intended
to publish structure but the postdoc left and nobody else was able to do the
work.
Christine, you have got good advises already. Contact the authors and if they
are reasonable publish back to back, if they are not - you do not have any
legal/moral obligations to wait.
My two drams,
Vaheh
________________________________
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 11:04 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Etiquette on publishing if there is a crystallization
report from someone else.
In the very early days, solving a protein structure was an enormous amount of
work and since hardly any protein structures were solved there was a huge pool
of unsolved structures. Under these circumstances, it was a waste of resources
if two groups would work on the same protein. To prevent this, people would
publish crystallization notes so other groups could choose another protein to
work on and this is what usually happened. Also, the purpose of scientific
publications is that other people can use this information to progress their
results.
Unless unethical actions were involved (holding up referee reports, making
shortcuts to publish before the competition) I do not see a reason why you
could not publish your paper. As Jürgen suggested, you may want to contact the
other group to see if you could publish back to back.
my two cents,
Herman
________________________________
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lukacs,
Christine
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 3:33 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [ccp4bb] Etiquette on publishing if there is a crystallization report
from someone else.
I'd like to get a community opinion on something.
If a group has published crystallization and diffraction data (Acta Cryst F
style crystallization report), and you happen to have the same crystal form and
have solved the structure, is there an unspoken rule that you don't publish, or
an amount of time that you wait to allow the other group to publish before you
do? I am not talking about a high impact structure with a race to publish.
Just looking for a general consensus.
Thanks
Christine
Christine Lukacs, Ph.D.
Principal Scientist
Roche
[email protected]
This message is intended for the use of the named recipient(s) only and may
contain confidential and/or proprietary information. If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete this message. Any
unauthorized use of the information contained in this message is prohibited.
To the extent this electronic communication or any of its attachments contain
information that is not in the public domain, such information is considered by
MedImmune to be confidential and proprietary. This communication is expected to
be read and/or used only by the individual(s) for whom it is intended. If you
have received this electronic communication in error, please reply to the
sender advising of the error in transmission and delete the original message
and any accompanying documents from your system immediately, without copying,
reviewing or otherwise using them for any purpose. Thank you for your
cooperation.
