If the information is out there and had been published, then I do not see the point why it cannot be used to get your story out. I assumed that you will cite their Acta F paper.

You might ended up waiting for a long time to get your structure out, so why wait? It also depends whose project is it. If it is a project of a PhD student (like me), getting it published as soon as possible (and even if it is a low impact) is important career stepping stone. I do agree though that contacting the (competing) authors of the Acta F is the best advised.

Also, not because you published your structure means the other group cannot published their structure.

Allan

Quoting "Lukacs, Christine" <christine.luk...@roche.com>:

I'd like to get a community opinion on something.

If a group has published crystallization and diffraction data (Acta Cryst F style crystallization report), and you happen to have the same crystal form and have solved the structure, is there an unspoken rule that you don't publish, or an amount of time that you wait to allow the other group to publish before you do? I am not talking about a high impact structure with a race to publish.

Just looking for a general consensus.

Thanks
Christine

Christine Lukacs, Ph.D.
Principal Scientist
Roche
christine.luk...@roche.com
This message is intended for the use of the named recipient(s) only and may contain confidential and/or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete this message. Any unauthorized use of the information contained in this message is prohibited.





--
Allan Pang

PhD Student

G35 Joseph Priestley Building
Queen Mary University of London
London
E1 4NS

Phone number: 02078828480

Twitter: @xerophytes

Reply via email to