I found a fix, but not an explanation. I scaled the same data with
scalepack and had no problem with loosing reflections. I am not sure what
happened in HKL2000.

Ursula

On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Phil Jeffrey <[email protected]>wrote:

> Ursula,
>
> I/sigI of -3 as I recall.
>
> Are you sure that the downstream programs you are using aren't the ones
> applying the cutoff ?  Scalepack is, in general, perfectly happy to write
> negative intensities to output.sca and certainly is doing so as of HKL3000.
>  Perhaps you need to use the TRUNCATE YES option in Truncate ?  Does the
> output MTZ from Scalepack2mtz show the number of reflections you expect ?
>
>
> Phil Jeffrey
> Princeton
>
>
> On 7/5/13 3:24 PM, Ursula Schulze-Gahmen wrote:
>
>> Sorry for the non-CCP4 question.
>>
>> I am confused about the sigma cutoff used by HKL2000 for scaling. I
>> scaled a data set to 3.0 A resolution. I collected a complete dataset
>> to 2.8A, but the I/sigma is about 1.0 at 3.0 A. The scaling logfile in
>> HKL2000 shows 100% completeness in the highest resolution shell, but
>> about 50% of the reflections are below I/sigma =0 in the highest
>> resolution shell. I am guessing that these negative reflections are
>> not being written out, because the output file from HKL200 does not
>> have 100% completeness anymore. I would like to include these negative
>> reflections. Is there a setting in HKL2000 that I can change or do I
>> need to switch to a different program.
>>
>> Ursula
>>
>>
>


-- 
Ursula Schulze-Gahmen, Ph.D.
Assistant Researcher
UC Berkeley, QB3
356 Stanley Hall #3220
Berkeley, CA 94720-3220

Reply via email to