I've generally found that adding lines to the "standard" table works, and they are not removed by editors
On 19 Nov 2013, at 09:32, Tim Gruene <[email protected]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Dear Graeme, > > On 11/19/2013 09:02 AM, Graeme Winter wrote: >> [...] For the merged I/sig(I) Rpim is much more instructive. I'd >> love it if people reported merged and unmerged I/sig(I), Rmerge, >> Rmeas, Rpim, CC1/2, ... as each of these tells something >> different. > Depending on where you publish the editor will ask you to use their > standard layout for the table which was probably last updated in the > 1990's given the presence of something as sophisticated as an Rfree... > > That's my recent experience, which undermined my preference for > scientifically sound journals over tabloids. Unfortunately, it's the > latter that funding agency like better ... > > Best, > Tim > > >> >> Best wishes, >> >> Graeme >> >> Possibly useful papers: >> >> http://www.nature.com/nsmb/journal/v4/n4/abs/nsb0497-269.html >> http://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/paper?he0191 >> http://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/paper?he0268 >> >> >> >> >> On 19 November 2013 06:43, Shanti Pal Gangwar >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Dear All >>> >>> >>> Can anyone explain the meaning and relevance of data when the >>> Rmerge is 100% in high resolution shell and I/sig(I) is 3. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> >>> >>> -- ******************** regards Shanti Pal Gangwar School of Life >>> Sciences Jawaharlal Nehru University New Delhi-110067 India >>> Email:[email protected] >>> >>> >>> >> > > - -- > - -- > Dr Tim Gruene > Institut fuer anorganische Chemie > Tammannstr. 4 > D-37077 Goettingen > > GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > iD8DBQFSizAgUxlJ7aRr7hoRAtW8AJ9faxDJ6Wz2F5frob8PlOOXne2ZMACfdGxv > fA0SSd2GsXKQRqZwg6MHjOk= > =fyIi > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
