Just to follow up on this: The enormous increase between the TFZ= and TFZ== numbers is surprising, so I focused on that in my original answer to Fred's question. However, if anyone wants to know the difference between these, it's documented on this web page: http://www.phaser.cimr.cam.ac.uk/index.php/Molecular_Replacement#Annotation.
Best wishes, Randy Read On 5 Dec 2013, at 08:36, vellieux <[email protected]> wrote: > Hiyya all, > > I have a question about the latest Phaser output, concerning TFZ = and TFZ == > . > > I do not know how to interpret outputs of the type > > TFZ = 5.2 TFZ == 54.1; > TFZ = 5.8 TFZ == 63.0; > TFZ = 6.4 TFZ == 19.7 (these are real TFZ figures coming from Phaser log > files). > > I used to analyse the Phaser output using TFZ, when only a single number was > given. Now with two figures to consider, I do not know what to think of it > any more. > > Any ideas "out there" ? > > And best wishes for an enjoyable end-of-the-year season (be it in the cold or > in the sun depending on which side of the planet you sit). > > Fred. > > -- > Fred. Vellieux (B.Sc., Ph.D., hdr) > > IBS2 / ELMA > Campus EPN > 6 rue Jules Horowitz > F-38042 Grenoble > Tel: +33 457428605 > (Fax: +33 438785494) ------ Randy J. Read Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge Cambridge Institute for Medical Research Tel: + 44 1223 336500 Wellcome Trust/MRC Building Fax: + 44 1223 336827 Hills Road E-mail: [email protected] Cambridge CB2 0XY, U.K. www-structmed.cimr.cam.ac.uk
