Great response, thanks everyone.

Best advice came from Harry Powell, James Murry and Marcus Winter: Talk to the guys in the Chemistry department. Didn't even know we had such a thing. Or at least the diffractometer there. Didn't know about that. The student will be much better taken care of.

There were also good suggestions for how to deal with small-molecule data on PX equipment. Before I die of boredom, I'll give this a try, but it won't be any time soon.

Best.


Andreas



On 24/03/2014 7:15, [email protected] wrote:
Hi,

   this depends on your equipment. You can mount a 0.1-0.2 mm xtal as if it was
a protein crystal onto a regular litho loop or better yet on a steel pin
that has a glass fibre glued into it. Use superglue to glue the crystal at
one end carefully to the glass fibre.
Then it is easy to mount the crystal as if it was a protein crystal.
Expect to move your detector as close as it is possible without bumping into
things. Hopefully you can get to about 1.4 A (or better but 1.4 is probably
the least resolution you need to get). Try different exposure times and or
x-ray generator currents so that you don't get overloads. Still use 1 deg
oscillation range. Not useful to go higher in my experience.
HKL2000 will work with the small molecule license but even the macro license
should work (but requires a bit more fiddling with some of the parameters).
Use direct methods in shelxs or shelxd(?). Keep in mind that the space group
may be centric or has mirror planes: P21/c is quite common but I would not go
so far as to suggest a space group without having seen some data.
Then use shelxs (or h) to refine the structure. You may find it useful to get
a copy of platon (Prof. Spek). http://www.cryst.chem.uu.nl/spek/platon/

Or wingx: http://www.chem.gla.ac.uk/~louis/software/wingx/

It's doable but takes a bit of time if you have no small molecule
crystallography background.

Ah and before you start, ask the student for elemental analysis results. If
the compound contains very heavy atoms, your CuKa radiation may not be useful.
In that case or perhaps in all cases if you need to switch to Mo radiation
(then resolution is not a problem as in the case of CuKa radiation).


Good luck.

Lothar

.


--
                  Andreas Förster
     Crystallization and X-ray Facility Manager
           Centre for Structural Biology
              Imperial College London

Reply via email to