Dear Chris,

In my experience, modern refinement program manage quite well to deconvolute 
occupancy and B-factor. In your case the negative difference density 
surrounding your metal ion shows that the lower occupancy could not be fudged 
by a higher B-factor. I would just refine occupancy and B-factor at the same 
time and let the refinement program do the deconvolution. If your density maps 
would still indicate problems, you always can try to manually deconvolute.

By the way, your formulation <attempt to "flatten" the negative density> sounds 
like some cheap trick, when in fact you try to get a model that more accurately 
reflects your observed diffraction pattern.

Best,
Herman


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Chris 
Fage
Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Mai 2014 19:03
An: [email protected]
Betreff: [ccp4bb] Refining Metal Ion Occupancy

Hi Everyone,

In my 2.5-angstrom structure, there is negative Fo-Fc density surrounding a 
metal ion after refining in Phenix. From anomalous diffraction I am certain of 
the metal's identity and position in each monomer. Also, the ion is 
appropriately coordinated by nearby side chains. Should I be refining the 
occupancy of the ion in attempt to "flatten" the negative density? I am 
considering soaking the metal ion into crystals or cocrystallizing and 
collecting additional datasets.

Thanks for your help!

Regards,
Chris

Reply via email to