Excellent references. PEG 3350 appears to be hydrodynamically equivalent to a 20 kD globular protein. So for efficient separation, your protein needs to be significantly larger than 20 kDa on a GEC column. In a centrifugal filter (which is very inefficient--you need many exchanges and dilutions with buffer to get nearly quantitative removal) it is possible that "snaking" of linear polymer molecules through the pores might contribute to slightly more efficient removal than expected based solely on hydrodynamic radius.

GEC or a desalting column is definitely the quickest way to do this, if possible. Flow rates may have to be slow (hence a typical flow rate column separation) to allow for efficient distribution of solutes in the sample solution if it has increased viscosity.

Cheers,

_______________________________________
Roger S. Rowlett
Gordon & Dorothy Kline Professor
Department of Chemistry
Colgate University
13 Oak Drive
Hamilton, NY 13346

tel: (315)-228-7245
ofc: (315)-228-7395
fax: (315)-228-7935
email: rrowl...@colgate.edu

On 8/20/2014 4:18 PM, Reza Khayat wrote:
Hi,

I managed to significantly reduce the viscosity of the PEG solution via buffer 
exchange using a 100kDa MWCO ultrafiltration device. The following papers have 
fantastic tables of solutes with their hydrodynamic radii. Definitely worth a 
read, followed by printing and posting of the tables on walls next to the FPLC 
:)

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3055910/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1304934/


Best wishes,
Reza

Reza Khayat, PhD
Assistant Professor
The City College of New York
Department of Chemistry, MR-1135
160 Convent Avenue
New York, NY  10031
Tel. (212) 650-6070
www.khayatlab.org


---- Original message ----
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 18:57:07 +0000
From: CCP4 bulletin board <CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK> (on behalf of Alexander Aleshin 
<aales...@sanfordburnham.org>)
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Removing PEG3350
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK

     I meant application of GF as an ion exchange
     column.

   Oh, my goodness! Ion exchange is something else!
   It should read "buffer-exchange" = desalting column.
   On Aug 20, 2014, at 11:48 AM, Alexander Aleshin
   wrote:

     Dear Remie,
     I meant application of GF as an ion exchange
     column. You can use special ion exchange columns,
     but our lab often uses preparative GF columns for
     this task.  We just load the column, keeping
     sample volume <  the void volume. Thus, we do not
      concentrate a protein before an ion exchange,
     only after it. But that is inevitable. When I am
     afraid to loose a protein during its
     concentrating, I concentrate shoulders of the
     eluted peak first, then add a central part.
     My point was that it might be okay to exchange
     buffers by concentrating a protein, but other
     molecules like Peg3K would not penetrate the
     membrane as well as water or salts do, as a result
     their reduction in concentration will be
     unreliable. Like, you do a 10 fold
     concentrating/delusion of a solution, but the
     final concentration of PEG3K will drop only by 3
     fold...
     Alex
     On Aug 19, 2014, at 9:42 AM, Remie wrote:

       Hi Alex,
       I disagree with you even though GF is always the
       last step in my purifications.
       Because it involves concentration before and
       after the GF so during the concentration you can
       already be doing the buffer exchange.
       You use GF when you want to purify other protein
       impurities if they are different sizes. Of
       course it has other uses too. But not quite
       practical for just changing buffer also
       considering the amount of protein you could be
       loosing along the process. If one is careful,
       centripreps are best for concentrating and
       changing the buffer. I tell you this from
       experience with large hard to express proteins.
       Best of luck,
       Remie
       On Aug 19, 2014, at 10:45 AM, Alexander Aleshin
       <aales...@sanfordburnham.org> wrote:

         Remie,
         Actually, concentrating of a protein solution
         is not the best approach to removing low MW
         impurities, gel filtration chromatography is
          more reliable and ... faster.
         Regards,
         Alex
         On Aug 19, 2014, at 7:03 AM, Remie Fawaz-Touma
         wrote:

           Hi Reza, I had to do this before.
           This protocol works for any PEG and any
           chemical to be removed from a solution:
           buffer exchange into the new buffer you want
           your protein to be in. There are ways to do
           that by 15 mL Amicon concentrators from
           millipore for large volumes, or if your
           protein is already concentrated, there are
           some small 0.5 mL concentrators from
           millipore as well.
           The key is to keep your spinning at low
           speeds (concentrators manuals will tell you)
           so you don’t precipitate or loose
           your protein. Check your protein
           concentration every 2 hours just to make
           sure you are not loosing it on concentrator
           surfaces and so on.
           Good Luck,
           Remie
           On Aug 19, 2014, at 9:55 AM, Reza Khayat
           <rkha...@ccny.cuny.edu> wrote:

             Hi,

             Does anyone have a protocol for getting
             rid of PEG3350 from a protein sample?

             Best wishes,
             Reza

             Reza Khayat, PhD
             Assistant Professor
             The City College of New York
             Department of Chemistry, MR-1135
             160 Convent Avenue
             New York, NY  10031
             Tel. (212) 650-6070
             www.khayatlab.org

Reply via email to