You may write Polish if you wish - it's case insensitive :-) Sent from my iPhone
> On 26 Aug 2014, at 21:37, Harry Powell <ha...@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > > hi Jacob > > You'd have to ask Phil Evans for the definitive answer, but my understanding > is that it's a tribute to the developers of an integration and scaling > package which isn't distributed by CCP4 (and which doesn't come from the MPI > either). > > Harry > -- > Dr Harry Powell, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Francis Crick Avenue, > Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QH > Chairman of European Crystallographic Association SIG9 (Crystallographic > Computing) > >> On 26 Aug 2014, at 19:44, "Keller, Jacob" <kell...@janelia.hhmi.org> wrote: >> >> I’ve chuckled at the “polish” nomenclature before, as I assumed this was a >> reference to certain software developers, but if so, shouldn’t it be >> “Polish?” Or does it mean polish, in the sense of shoe polish? >> >> JPK >> >> From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Harry >> Powell >> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 2:32 PM >> To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK >> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Problems about i >> >> hi >> >> (1) provided the predictions match the spots (i.e. indexing etc has been >> successful) the best things to look at in the Integration task initially are >> the graphs - if they vary reasonably smoothly, and there are no big jumps >> then things have probably gone okay. >> >> (2) Really, the only way to reduce the mosaicity is to grow better crystals. >> Are you getting much larger values than with hkl2000? How many overlaps are >> you getting (both as the overall number and as a fraction of the whole?); >> there may be nothing wrong at all... >> >> (3) For everything apart from finding the heavy atom sub-structure with >> SHELXC/D/E, you want the MTZ file from ctruncate (so this is the one you >> want for molecular replacement). >> >> For SHELXC/D/E, you really want unmerged F^2 values which can be obtained by >> using the Aimless option "output polish unmerged" (as a processing option >> under "Integration"). >> >> HTH >> >> Harry >> -- >> Dr Harry Powell, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Francis Crick Avenue, >> Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QH >> Chairman of European Crystallographic Association SIG9 (Crystallographic >> Computing) >> >> On 26 Aug 2014, at 16:51, 陈昂 <angsc...@outlook.com> wrote: >> >> Dear all： >> >> It is my first time to use IMOSFLM instead of HKL2000. Here are my >> problems. Hope you can help me. >> >> 1、what parameters can indicate the result quality of my imosflm? mosaicity >> ,anything else? >> >> 2、what can I do to reduce the mosaicity and decrease bad spots,resolution or >> the spot finding range? >> >> 3、after imosflm, I've got some MTZ maps such as original one and pointless >> one,aimless one, ctruncate one. Which one should I take to the next >> step?what steps do I need to take before molecular replacement and why? >> >> >> THANKS a lot >> >> >> Peter Chen
