On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 4:05 PM, CPMAS Chen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Do you guys have some recommendation of the criteria? phenix reported > anomalous measurability, CCP4/aimless has RCRanom. Sometimes, they are not > consistent. > The "measurability" isn't always useful - it's definitely correlated with how easy it will be to find sites and experimentally phase the data, but it's very dependent on the sigmas being estimated accurately. I'm not sure what RCRanom is, but both Aimless and the new version of Xtriage (if using unmerged data as input) will report CC(anom), which is like CC1/2 for anomalous differences, and that should be pretty reliable. -Nat
