"Useable" anomalous signal depends on what you want to use it for...

If it is to generate experimental phases, then the SHELXC/D/E  criteria of
Dano/SigDano are pretty good.

If you already know the structure and want to check if there is Br there
then a much weaker signal can answer the question.

You need to do a anomalous difference map and search for peaks..

Steps are:
  Run refmac to generate output file with h k l F SIGF ... PHIC .. FOM..
  Run cad to merge refmac output with the DANO SIGDANO columns generated by
Ctruncate after data processing
  runn fft  with the "anomalous map" option and a peak search.
  Inputs DANO SIDANO PHIC FOM
 ( fft automatically advances PHIC by 90 degrees )


(Yes - it SHOULD be automated!! )

Read the peak search into coot
Check whether the sites show up likely anomalous scatterers - eg Br, S, Ca
etc..
This often works

Eleanor




On 4 September 2014 22:47, Boaz Shaanan <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Also, if you process your data using XDS, it'll give you good indication
> for the strength of the anomalous signal. I find the XDS and Aimless
> indications to agree quite well.
>
>        Boaz
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Boaz Shaanan, Ph.D.                                         Dept. of Life
> Sciences                                      Ben-Gurion University of the
> Negev                          Beer-Sheva
> 84105
> Israel
>                                                             E-mail:
> [email protected] <[email protected]> Phone: 972-8-647-2220  Skype:
> boaz.shaanan                  Fax:   972-8-647-2992 or 972-8-646-1710    *
>
>
>
>
>
>   ------------------------------
> *From:* CCP4 bulletin board [[email protected]] on behalf of CPMAS
> Chen [[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 04, 2014 11:05 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [ccp4bb] Reliable criteria to tell Anomalous or not?
>
>   Dear All CCP4 users,
>
>  Recently, I have protein crystals cocrytallized with Br-containing
> ligand. sometimes, I feel confusion about whether the data have reliable
> anomalous information or not.
>
>  Do you guys have some recommendation of the criteria? phenix reported
> anomalous measurability, CCP4/aimless has RCRanom. Sometimes, they are not
> consistent.
>
>  Thanks!
>
>  Charles
>
>  --
>
> ***************************************************
>
> Charles Chen
>
> Research Associate
>
> University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
>
> Department of Anesthesiology
>
> ******************************************************
>
>

Reply via email to