REMARK 2 is generated from _refine.ls_d_res_high http://mmcif.wwpdb.org/dictionaries/mmcif_pdbx_v40.dic/Items/_refine.ls_d_res_high.html
Regards John On Wednesday 08 July 2015 15:04:45 Jose Manuel Duarte wrote: > This looks like the mapping you are after: > > http://mmcif.wwpdb.org/docs/pdb_to_pdbx_correspondences.html > > It maps only the structured PDB data items to their equivalent mmCIF > items. For instance REMARK 2 is not there, but REMARK 200 is. The > resolution value should then be in "REMARK 200 RESOLUTION RANGE HIGH" > (corresponding to mmCIF data item _refine.ls_d_res_high). > > Jose > > On 07.07.2015 19:05, Phil Jeffrey wrote: > > I'm updating some code to have limited mmCIF/PDB format > > interoperability and have hit a snag. While I can infer the > > connection between some data items in the PDB header REMARK and the > > items in mmCIF I can't definitively deduce some others. In particular > > the mapping of > > REMARK 2 RESOLUTION > > seems a little ambiguous and the dictionary documentation doesn't help > > in this regard. > > > > Does anyone know where to find an explicit mapping of one data field > > to another between the two formats ? (I don't expect there to be a > > data field in the PDB header for everything in mmCIF but I do for the > > reverse case). > > > > > > Thanks > > Phil Jeffrey > > Princeton > -- John Berrisford PDBe European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI) European Molecular Biology Laboratory Wellcome Trust Genome Campus Hinxton Cambridge CB10 1SD UK Tel: +44 1223 492529
