Hi Peng,

first off, there is Phenix mailing list for Phenix-related questions.
phenix.real_space_refine is Phenix program, not CCP4 so any issues related
to it are best addressed at appropriate mailing list (Phenix mailing list,
that is).

To answer your you question: please send me all inputs (1.pdb, 2.mrc,
reference.eff, 20161215-3.pdb) and we will solve the problem. If files are
too large to send via email please use file-sharing tools such as Dropbox
or Google drive (I guess QQ has something for that too, if you are in
China).

All the best,
Pavel

On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 6:39 PM, Peng <[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> I met a problem when I tried to refine a EM structure using a reference
> model in Phenix.
>
> I used the command
>
> phenix.real_space_refine 1.pdb 2.mrc reference.eff  resolution=3.2
>
> , but it did not work.
>
>
> My reference.eff  is following:
>
> refinement {
>
>   reference_model {
>
>     enabled = True
>
>     reference_group {
>
>       reference = chain A
>
>       selection = chain A
>
>       file_name = 20161215-3.pdb
>
>     }
>
>     reference_group {
>
>       reference = chain B
>
>       selection = chain B
>
>       file_name = 20161215-3.pdb
>
>     }
>
>     reference_group {
>
>       reference = chain C
>
>       selection = chain C
>
>
>       file_name = 20161215-3.pdb
>
>    }
>
>    }
>
>   }
>
> }
>
>
> My output .log file is following:
>
>    reference_model {
>
>       enabled = False
>
>       file = None
>
>       use_starting_model_as_reference = False
>
>       sigma = 1.0
>
>       limit = 15.0
>
>       hydrogens = False
>
>       main_chain = True
>
>       side_chain = True
>
>       fix_outliers = True
>
>       strict_rotamer_matching = False
>
>       auto_shutoff_for_ncs = False
>
>       secondary_structure_only = False
>
>       reference_group {
>
>         reference = None
>
>         selection = None
>
>         file_name = None
>
> ......
>
>
> It seemed my reference.eff was not recognized.
>
> How can I use the reference model in Phenix refinement?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Peng
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to