It sounds a bit like this paper from a year ago: https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms12549 apart from the conclusion: here the point is that amateurs build higher quality models than crystallographers.
On 20 November 2017 at 20:25, Shintaro Aibara <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear All, > > Apologies for the slightly off-topic, but I was wondering if anybody knew of > a paper/textbook where a protein model was built by multiple people (ranging > from novice to experienced builders) and compared. I believe the conclusion > was that while the overall trace was broadly correct, experienced builders > maintained better geometry compared to beginners. > > I distinctly remember reading it a couple of years ago but cannot seem to > find the figure. If anybody knows of this figure/paper/textbook it would be > much appreciated if you could point me in the direction. > > Yours faithfully, > Shintaro
