Perhaps this can be automated: https://www.phenix-online.org/papers/wd5073_reprint.pdf
Software doesn't get tired or bored, and thus potentially can try more and produce more plausible interretations. Then one can hire a number of people of various expertise to choose "best" result according to their subjective interpretations. Pavel On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Shintaro Aibara <shintaro.aib...@gmail.com > wrote: > Dear All, > > Apologies for the slightly off-topic, but I was wondering if anybody knew > of a paper/textbook where a protein model was built by multiple people > (ranging from novice to experienced builders) and compared. I believe the > conclusion was that while the overall trace was broadly correct, > experienced builders maintained better geometry compared to beginners. > > I distinctly remember reading it a couple of years ago but cannot seem to > find the figure. If anybody knows of this figure/paper/textbook it would be > much appreciated if you could point me in the direction. > > Yours faithfully, > Shintaro >
