Hi Frank, could you please be more specific, and give examples - the more the better? That would help enormously in debugging. Information required is cell, spacegroup, and which reflection(s) (as h,k,l triples) is/are missing.
best, Kay On Thu, 5 Apr 2018 11:52:37 +0100, Frank von Delft <frank.vonde...@sgc.ox.ac.uk> wrote: >Hello - can anybody shed light on this mystery: > >We need (for PanDDA analysis) a lot of datasets each to have the >complete set of low resolution indices, whether measured or not. (Refmac >adds the estimates as DFc, which is crucial when comparing maps.) > >In ccp4, there are two obvious ways to get these indices complete: > > * uniqueify > * CAD using the keyword "RESOLUTION FILE 1 999 <highres>" (999 is the > low resolution limit). > >Mystifyingly, in ~1% of datasets, one or the other route misses one or >two indices. Our work-around is to go belt-and-braces and run both for >each dataset. > > >It does however remain a bug. Does anybody have any idea what's >happening? We can send example datasets to any volunteers who want to >fiddle with it. > >phx > > >
