Hi all,

This probably have already be discussed, but can't find trace of it :
Is there any reason I am not aware of that refinement software (thinking of
both phenix and refmac) do not output CC work / free ?
We all accepted CC 1/2 for resolution cut (whether it's 30 or 10 %) which
tend to lead to high Rfree ( last shells having very poor phases), at least
high overall R free in regard to the majority same resolution structures as
they been refined with I/sig > 3.
Which in return push people to cut resolution AFTER refinement which
obviously drastically decrease the R free and catapult your structure from
worst of the PDB to best of the PDB. It should never be done but it is
nonetheless.
How to blame a "non expert"  to do that when changing the resolution from
1.49 to 1.5 change your Rfree by 2% (yes it exaggerated but you get the
idea).
Now it seems to me -but I may be very wrong as I am far from expert in the
arcane math of these- that CC work and free would be more agnostic to this
resolution cut off problem, as we compare it to the CC* value anyway ?
thought it will never start to be used if refinement software don't output
it as a standard (not talking about completely replacing Rfree here as it
is obviously useful).
Would CC work/free be a bad appreciation of the refinement process ?

Thanks

Clément

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

Reply via email to