Also, values in parentheses (high-res shell) depend on how you (the program you use) do binning. Different programs do it differently and so these values can vary quite substantially. With a little of trial-and-error effort choosing the binning one can make these values farther or closer to overall R. To me this is a hint that these numbers are not very useful. A plot R (completeness, ..) vs resolution is much more useful than the values for an arbitrarily defined resolution bin! Pavel
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:57 AM Jan van Agthoven <janc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > I’m trying to publish two structures at 3.1Å resolution with the following > refinement statistics: > > Resolution range (Å) 49.2-3.1 > 49.3-3.1 > *R*factor (%) 24.0 (32.4) > 23.4 (32.0) > *R*free (%) 26.6 (29.2) > 26.3 (31.6) > > *Data collection* > > Completeness 100 (100) > 100 (100) > > Redundancy 6.9 (7.0) > 6.2 (6.3) > > Molecules in asymmetric unit 1 > 1 > > Average* I*/σ 14.1 (1.7) > 15.3 (2.0) > > *Rmerge *(%) 14.9 (100) > 12.7 (100) > > *Rmeas* (%) 16.2 (100) > 13.9 (100) > > *Rsym* (%) 6.2 (68.6) > 5.5 (57.1) > Wilson *B*-factor 65.6 > 62.7 > > I’ve been told that the Rfree factor in the* last shell* are too high. > Does anyone know how I can improve these Rfree factors other then cutting > the resolution, which already is rather low? > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link: > https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1 > ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
