Hi Paul, I think this is a very good call as CONECT records are notoriously unreliable. Many PDB files don't have them and many programs don't update them when you change atom numbers. Even in annotated PDB entries there are many problems with those. It's better to forget about them altogether and focus on the mmCIF format.
Cheers, Robbie On 2 Nov 2019 02:15, Paul Emsley <[email protected]> wrote: On 01/11/2019 20:17, Pavel Mader wrote: > Hello, Hello. > > I have a question, can anyone explain, why does Coot not display a covalent > bond manually specified by > CONECT line in a pdb file? Because I have never thought them necessary. Using SSBOND, LINK and residue dictionaries seemed to me to cover the bases for which CONECT would be used. Paul. ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
