Hi Katrin,

First, I think you meant that the green density disappears after contouring at 
6 Sigma and not 6 A?
That you ligand is only partly visible due to disorder and has partial 
occupancy happens often and is no reason for concern. Of course, you could try 
soaking with a 10-fold higher ligand concentration of that would be possible.
The approach you use: fit would you see and don’t fit what you don’t see is 
also correct. However, as you come closer to the noise level of your electron 
density map, you have to be more careful not to introduce model bias and 
artefacts. What I would to copy your current pdb file to another pdb file, 
delete the ligand you fitted and any water molecules near the ligand and run a 
few rounds of refinement to get an unbiased omit map. Then view this map 
together with your refined ligand a see if it makes sense.

Good luck and happy holidays!
Herman

Von: CCP4 bulletin board <[email protected]> Im Auftrag von Katherine Lim
Gesendet: Freitag, 20. Dezember 2019 05:57
An: [email protected]
Betreff: [EXTERNAL] [ccp4bb] Potential weak binding ligand in the active site


EXTERNAL : Real sender is 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

Hi all,

I apologise in advance for the long post. I am working on solving a structure 
that looks like it could have a ligand bound in the active site. My data was 
obtained from a crystal of just the soluble domain of my protein that had been 
soaked overnight in the ligand solution. The apo crystal structure is already 
known and so I have solved my structure using phaser MR. I have attached the 
Aimless report output of my structure at the end of this email. The current R 
values I have after refinement and adding in all the waters are Rfree: 0.2413 
and Rwork: 0.1897. I can clearly see green density that is much larger (only 
disappears when I contour the Fo-Fc map to about 6 A) than in my control 
crystal that had been soaked in the same concentration of just solvent (I had 
used DMF).

I am struggling to add in my ligand as it doesn't seem like the entire ligand 
can fit in the green density. We think it may be because we have only used the 
soluble domain and so the ligand isn't held very securely since the 
transmembrane domain is missing. I have been trying to fit in smaller sections 
of it and doing an occupancy refinement. So far I have been able to get part of 
the ligand in with an occupancy of about 0.6 but after the refinement run, 
phenix.refine seems to move this part of the ligand slightly out of the area 
where I had tried to fit it into the green density. Interestingly, there isn't 
a big red density in the area that this ligand section has moved to. I would 
appreciate any advice on how I should proceed with trying to figure out if I 
have tried the correct section of the ligand and the kind of refinement 
settings to use with a weak binder.

Space Group
P212121
Unit cell abc
84.76, 89.84, 91.55
unit cell alpha beta gamma
90, 90, 90
OVERALL
LOW RES
HIGH RES
Low res limit
45.78
45.78
1.94
High res limit
1.9
9.11
1.9
Rmerge
0.234
0.052
1.684
Rmeas
0.244
0.054
1.768
Rpim
0.069
0.016
0.527
Total # observations
663073
6282
36851
Total # unique
55174
579
3359
I/sigma
7.5
27.9
1.4
CC ½
0.997
0.999
0.747
Completeness %
99
98.7
94.7
Multiplicity
12
10.8
11

Katherine Lim

PhD Candidate

School of Biomedical Sciences; School of Molecular Sciences

Marshall Centre for Infectious Disease Research and Training

The University of Western Australia

________________________________

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.jiscmail.ac.uk_cgi-2Dbin_webadmin-3FSUBED1-3DCCP4BB-26A-3D1&d=DwMFaQ&c=Dbf9zoswcQ-CRvvI7VX5j3HvibIuT3ZiarcKl5qtMPo&r=HK-CY_tL8CLLA93vdywyu3qI70R4H8oHzZyRHMQu1AQ&m=7_VYfH8Ol87eqoDkMqPGum6JMrkXaDZxWlhebE8lJRY&s=lLLEY5jR53T_a8okR4d7jd4jhwO7--B0zCRTBBMzbmo&e=>

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

Reply via email to