Is the R factor for the best solution really > 40% - if so there must be
some major errors to correct.
Eleanor

On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 at 11:08, John R Helliwell <jrhelliw...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dear Rafal,
> The difference map you show in your attachment has an echo of the main
> structure sort of look. So, I suggest you examine your diffraction images
> specifically looking out for a supercell of weak intensity spots, not
> picked up by the autoindexing, between the main lattice of intensities,
> which provided your current unit cell.
> Best wishes,
> John
> Emeritus Professor John R Helliwell DSc
>
>
>
>
> > On 29 Jul 2020, at 13:42, Rafal Dolot <rdo...@cbmm.lodz.pl> wrote:
> >
> > Dear CCP4 users,
> >
> > I'm working on the another nucleic acid duplex structure. After several
> stages of rebuilding and refinement I observed something like a "shadow" of
> the second duplex position. Have you any ideas to explain this phenomena?
> Should I place the second molecule with occupancy completed to the first
> one? Or maybe is it a kind of disorder in crystal lattice? Data were
> collected to 1.02A using synchrotron radiation (processed with XDS), but I
> have another datasets collected to lower resolution (from Zn-SAD) with
> visible similar effects. Refinement was done using Refmac (R/Rfree
> 21.5/24.0). Data not appeared to be twinned, but Xtriage detected
> pseudo-translational symmetry.
> >
> > Thank you for any advices.
> >
> > Rafal
> >
> > |----------------------------------------------|
> > |Rafal Dolot, Ph.D.                            |
> > |                                              |
> > |Polish Academy of Sciences                    |
> > |Centre of Molecular and Macromolecular Studies|
> > |Department of Bioorganic Chemistry            |
> > |Macromolecular Crystallography Team           |
> > |Sienkiewicza 112                              |
> > |90-363 Lodz, Poland                           |
> > |Phone: +48(42)6803215                         |
> > |Cell:  +48 502897781                          |
> > |----------------------------------------------|
> >
> > ########################################################################
> >
> > To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> > https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
> >
> > This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a
> mailing list hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are
> available at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/
> > <duplex.png>
>
> ########################################################################
>
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
>
> This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a
> mailing list hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are
> available at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/
>

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/

Reply via email to