Hello Marc-

My first thought is do you have the correct space group? Are you searching for 
other space groups in the point group? Second, helicases are multimers, but the 
orientation of the monomers that make up the multimers may deviate 
significantly. If you didn't use a monomer, it's worth doing so. Likewise, 
using the hexamer might be better. Is searching with a complete multimer 
sensible, ie would crystallographic symmetry cause overlaps due to coincidence 
of a non-crystallographic axis with a crystallographic axis? If you are 
searching with a multimer, even if you get a solution, you may very likely need 
to rigid body refine all "domains/subdomains" of the solution to proceed toward 
better r-factors. Lastly, trim as much as you can from the search model to get 
to the core, give that a shot.

Can you calculate the self-rotation function? What does it tell you about 
potential symmetry and orientation of symmetry vs. your best solution?

What program are you using, phaser? what does the LLG score look like?

I'm happy to discuss further if you like.

Best-
Todd
________________________________
From: CCP4 bulletin board <[email protected]> on behalf of Marco Bravo 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2024 4:44 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: [ccp4bb] Difficult Molecular replacement

Hello all,
I recently collected data on some plate crystals for a previously 
uncharacterized protein at the ALS light source. The XDS auto-data processing 
log output indicates that my resolution is 2.8 angstroms. The protein is a 
helicase with homologs already in the protein data bank making it a suitable 
target for molecular replacement which I thought initially. However after 
trying molecular replacements with all known homologs in the protein data bank 
the R values remain high after MR >0.5. After an initial round of Rigid body or 
restrained refinement. The R values still remain very high at around >.5. I 
have tried MR with Rosetta and alphaphold models but the problem of high R 
values persists. The best solution I get is from the CCP4 cloud automatic 
molecular replacement and model building pipeline which gives me a free R value 
of 0.46.. However the solution is only for residues ~100-326 out of a 543 amino 
acid long protein. And even then the model still has a lot of missing residues 
and truncated sidechains and overall fits the map quite poorly. Does anyone 
have any suggestions about how I can solve my structure if at all possible at 
this point? I ran the crystals and pre-crystalized samples on a gel and it 
appears that the protein remains stable during crystallization as the molecular 
weight did not change or any degradation does not appear.

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jiscmail.ac.uk%2Fcgi-bin%2FWA-JISC.exe%3FSUBED1%3DCCP4BB%26A%3D1&data=05%7C02%7Ctgreen%40UAB.EDU%7Ce2b2eaceb1c84962085e08dc319dcbbe%7Cd8999fe476af40b3b4351d8977abc08c%7C1%7C1%7C638439800998244676%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=EN%2FqVDVHvgyY9Ur8%2FGsV2eInIhU1N6N9fBdK5sNpeuE%3D&reserved=0<https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1>

This message was issued to members of 
https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jiscmail.ac.uk%2FCCP4BB&data=05%7C02%7Ctgreen%40UAB.EDU%7Ce2b2eaceb1c84962085e08dc319dcbbe%7Cd8999fe476af40b3b4351d8977abc08c%7C1%7C1%7C638439800998251769%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=y05Xe8HjIjkvCGxz5ZCg%2FrkjhXTX4Rpiq5of2bZCukM%3D&reserved=0<http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB>,
 a mailing list hosted by 
https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jiscmail.ac.uk%2F&data=05%7C02%7Ctgreen%40UAB.EDU%7Ce2b2eaceb1c84962085e08dc319dcbbe%7Cd8999fe476af40b3b4351d8977abc08c%7C1%7C1%7C638439800998259001%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=auvuhLZsoyHa%2FQ64Grf%2Fe1Pw2w%2B0jQBRj7SuLl9Hp%2FU%3D&reserved=0<http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/>,
 terms & conditions are available at 
https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jiscmail.ac.uk%2Fpolicyandsecurity%2F&data=05%7C02%7Ctgreen%40UAB.EDU%7Ce2b2eaceb1c84962085e08dc319dcbbe%7Cd8999fe476af40b3b4351d8977abc08c%7C1%7C1%7C638439800998263941%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=o3ZLf%2BCt%2BVy33BmVaN5WvHelbRyDMUMBGjor9isAK88%3D&reserved=0<https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/>

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/

Reply via email to